Negativity in the Evaluation of Political Candidates

EXTENDED ABSTRACT - The most well accepted explanation for the negativity effect (greater weighting of negatives as compared to positives in the formation of overall evaluations) in the political domain is the perceptual figure-ground theory (also known as the salience explanation or the expectancy-contrast explanation, Fiske 1980; Klein 1991, 1996). This theory is based on the argument that people generally exhibit a Aperson positivity bias@ whereby they have positive expectations of others (Sears 1983), including political candidates, and negatives contrast against these expectations. From Anderson’s (1981) cognitive algebra theory through to the figure-ground explanation, non-motivational explanations for negativity dominate.


Jill G. Klein and Rohini Ahluwalia (2005) ,"Negativity in the Evaluation of Political Candidates", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 32, eds. Geeta Menon and Akshay R. Rao, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 21-22.


Jill G. Klein, INSEAD
Rohini Ahluwalia, University of Minnesota


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 32 | 2005

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


H2. Influencing Consumer Response to Products with High Styling: The Role of Mindsets

Ying-Ching Lin, National Chengchi Uniersity, Taiwan
Angela Chang, Northeastern University, USA

Read More


N13. Smaller Self but Larger Tips? The Effect of Awe on Consumers’ Tipping Intention

Ran Li, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China

Read More


Machine Talk: How Conversational Chatbots Promote Brand Intimacy and Influence Consumer Choice

Thomas Hilden, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Christian Hildebrand, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Gerald Häubl, University of Alberta, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.