When Research Participants Don’T Tell It Like It Is: Pinpointing the Effects of Social Desirability Bias Using Self Vs. Indirect-Questioning

EXTENDED ABSTRACT - Social desirability bias reflects the basic human nature to present oneself in a positive manner to others. Typically, this tendency takes the form of over-reporting opinions and behaviors that are congruent with values deemed socially acceptable and under-reporting those deemed socially undesirable. This bias concerns many behavioral researchers because of its threat to construct validity in measurement construction. However, social desirability bias is not just a problem for scale construction, but it can also present problems as a moderating variable or confounding factor when examining behavior. Since so much consumer behavior research examines the influences of others on attitudes and behaviors, as well as social/symbolic presentation, we would expect consumer research to potentially suffer from the compromising effects of social desirability bias. King and Bruner’s (2000) investigation of papers published in top marketing journals from 1980-1997 revealed that only thirteen papers tested social desirability bias as a potential source of error.



Citation:

Sabrina M. Neeley and Maria L. Cronley (2004) ,"When Research Participants Don’T Tell It Like It Is: Pinpointing the Effects of Social Desirability Bias Using Self Vs. Indirect-Questioning", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 31, eds. Barbara E. Kahn and Mary Frances Luce, Valdosta, GA : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 432-433.

Authors

Sabrina M. Neeley, Miami University
Maria L. Cronley, Miami University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 31 | 2004



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

How Matte Product Surface Enhances Perceived Durability

Taehoon Park, University of South Carolina, USA
Junghan Kim, Singapore Management University, Singapore

Read More

Featured

When High-End Designers Partner With Low-Cost Retailers: Bridging the Access Gap

Gabriel E. Gonzales, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Johanna Slot, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Margaret Meloy, Pennsylvania State University, USA

Read More

Featured

Born to Shop? A Genetic Component of Deal Proneness

Robert M Schindler, Rutgers University, USA
Vishal Lala, Pace University
Jeanette Taylor, Florida State University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.