Is It Still Worth to Be Credible? a Meta-Analysis of Temporal Patterns of Source Credibility Effects in Marketing

ABSTRACT - The purpose of this study is the examination of the development of the impact of source credibility in marketing communication over the years. A meta-analysis was applied to 167 relevant effect sizes. The results indicate that the effect of source credibility increased over the years. The rise was stronger especially for sources communicating personally with the consumers than for other sources, and for communication about services compared to communication about goods. Also, the rise of the effect sizes was stronger for cognitive and attitudinal effects than for other effects.


Martin Eisend (2004) ,"Is It Still Worth to Be Credible? a Meta-Analysis of Temporal Patterns of Source Credibility Effects in Marketing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 31, eds. Barbara E. Kahn and Mary Frances Luce, Valdosta, GA : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 352-357.


Martin Eisend, Freie UniversitSt Berlin


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 31 | 2004

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Don’t Tell Me Who I Am! When and How Assigning Consumers an Identity Backfires

Noah Castelo, Columbia University, USA
Kirk Kristofferson, Ivey Business School
Kelley Main, University of Manitoba, Canada
Katherine White, University of British Columbia, Canada

Read More


Pangs from Persuasion: When Recommendations Undermine Consumers’ Social Worth

Suzanne Galia Rath, Queens University, Canada
Laurence Ashworth, Queens University, Canada
Nicole Robitaille, Queens University, Canada

Read More


O13. Pain of Loss: How Losing in a Promotional Competition Influences Consumer Attitude

Arash Talebi, ESSEC Business School
Sonja Prokopec, ESSEC Business School
Ayse Onculer, ESSEC Business School

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.