Measuring the Brand Personality of Non-Profit Organizations

EXTENDED ABSTRACT - Prior research regarding brand personality has focused primarily on the dimensions of brand personality of consumer goods and services in the for profit and governmental sectors. The measurement of brand personality has also been examined across various cultural contexts (Aaker 2000; Aaker, Benet-Martinez, Garolera 2001; Ferrandi, Florence, and Falcy 2000). These studies have established that there are consistencies in brand personality dimensions (Aaker 1997) by consumers across different cultures. This research extends the conceptualization and measurement of brand personality to the nonprofit sector.



Citation:

Beverly T. Venable, Gregory M. Rose, and Faye W. Gilbert (2003) ,"Measuring the Brand Personality of Non-Profit Organizations", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 30, eds. Punam Anand Keller and Dennis W. Rook, Valdosta, GA : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 379-380.

Advances in Consumer Research Volume 30, 2003     Pages 379-380

MEASURING THE BRAND PERSONALITY OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

Beverly T. Venable, East Carolina University

Gregory M. Rose, The University of Mississippi

Faye W. Gilbert, The University of Mississippi

EXTENDED ABSTRACT -

Prior research regarding brand personality has focused primarily on the dimensions of brand personality of consumer goods and services in the for profit and governmental sectors. The measurement of brand personality has also been examined across various cultural contexts (Aaker 2000; Aaker, Benet-Martinez, Garolera 2001; Ferrandi, Florence, and Falcy 2000). These studies have established that there are consistencies in brand personality dimensions (Aaker 1997) by consumers across different cultures. This research extends the conceptualization and measurement of brand personality to the nonprofit sector.

Initially, a discovery approach was taken and three qualitative studies were conducted to explore individuals’ perceptions of brand personality related to three different classifications or product categories of nonprofit organizations: health, environment/rights, arts/humanities. The results of these three studies indicated that people can differentiate between nonprofit organizations on the basis of human personality traits. Building on the outcomes of the qualitative studies, a quantitative approach was undertaken to empirically examine the brand personality dimensions of nonprofit organizations. This was done using the measurement of brand personality developed by Aaker (1997), items adapted from Green and Webb (1997) and the unique traits that were identified by the participant in the qualitative studies of this research.

Several major findings emerged from this process. First, the quantitative study supported what was indicated in the discovery phase, individuals can easily ascribe human personality traits to nonprofit organizations and that these associations vary across different product categories (the brand personality of the March of Dimes has traits that are unique of different from those of Public Broadcasting Services. Second, a five-factor structure of nonprofit brand personality emerged that included four of the five dimensions identified by Aaker (1997), Excitement, Competence, Sophistication, and Ruggedness), the fifth factor was Nurturing.

REFERENCES

AAFRC (2001) Giving USA, The Annual Report on Philanthropy, American Association of Fundraising Council, Inc., 10293 N. Meridian Street, Suite 175, Indianapolis, IN 46290.

Aaker, D. A.(1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. The Free Press.

Aaker, J. L. (2000). Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (March), 340-356.

Aaker, J. L. (1999). The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(February), 45-57.

Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(August), 347-356.

Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, Vericona and Garolea, Jordi. (2001). Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), Washington, 492-508.

Annoymous (2001) Cancer Society Executive Surrenders to the F. B. I. New York Times. June 11, 2001.

Bendapudi, N., Singh, S. N., & Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(July), 33-49.

Berry, L. (2000). Cultivating Service Brand Equity. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 128-137.

Boris, Elizabeth T. (1999). "Nonprofit Organizations in a Democracy: Varied Roles and Responsibilities," in Nonprofit and Government, ed. By Elizabeth T. Boris and Eugene Steuerle, Washington, DC,: Urban Institute Press.

Blum, D. E. (2002). "Ties That Bind" The Chronicle of Philanthropy, Volume XIV, No. 11, March 21, 2002. 7-10.

Burnett, J.J. (1981). Psychographic and Demographic Characteristics of Blood Donors. Journal of Consumer Research. 8(June). 62-66.

Churchill, J., & A., G. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(February), 46-73.

Duffy, M. and Gibbs, N. (1999). Who Chose George? Time Magazine, Vol. 153(24), June 21, 24-30.

Ferrandi, J-M., Valette-Florence, S. Fine-Falcy (2000). Aaker’s Brand Personality Scale in a French Context: A Replication and a Preliminary Test of its Validity. In Proceedings of Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 23: 7-13.

Green, C. L., & Webb, D. J. (1997). Factors Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 5(3), 19-41.

John, O. P. (1990). The 'Big Five’ Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in Natural Language and in Questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.

Harvey, J. H. (1990). Benefit Segmentation for Fund Raisers. Journal of Academy of Marketing Sciences, 18(1), 77-86.

Hawks, J. K. (1997). "Charity American Style", For A Good Cause?: How Charitable Institutions Become Powerful Economic Bullies. Secaucus, NJ 07094: Carol Publishing Group. 3-13.

Hodgkinson, V. A., Weitzman, M. S., Noga, S. M., & Gorski, H. A. (1993). A Portrait of The Independent Sector: The Activities and Finances of Charitable Organizations. Washington, DC.

Independent Sector (2001). "Giving and Volunteering in the United States 2001". Independent Sector, 1200 Eighteenth Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036.

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1-22.

Kotler, P., & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33, 10-15.

Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols By Which We Buy. Paper presented at the American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.

Marguilles, W. P. (1977). Make the Most of Your Corporate Identity, Harvard Business Review, 55(4). 61-77.

McCrae, R., & Paul T.Costa, J. (1989). The Structure of Interpersonal Traits: Wiggins’s Circumplex and Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 586-595.

McDaniel Carl, J., & Gates, R. (1998). Marketing Research Essentials ( Vol. 2nd Edition). Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.

Mindak, William A. & Bybee, Malcolm H. (1971). Marketing’s Application to Fundraising. Journal Of Marketing. 35, 13-18.

Mishra, K., & Orlowsky, S. (2000). Study finds Army brand needs repair. Marketing News, 34(18), 17-18.

Morley, E., Vinson, E. and Hatry, H.P. (2001). Outcome Measurement in Nonprofit Organizations: Current Practices and Recommendations. Independent Sector, 1200 Eighteenth Street, N.W., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036, 5-10.

Nunnally. (1979). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. NJ

O’Shaughnessy, J., & O’Shaughnessy, N. J. (2000). Treating the Nation as a Brand: Some Neglected Issues. Journal of Macromarketing, 20(1), 56-65.

Peters, T. (1999). The Brand You 50: Fifty Ways to Transform Yourself from an Employee to a Brand that Shouts Distinction, Commitment, and Passion! New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

Plummer, J.T. (2000). How Personality Makes A Difference. Journal of Advertising Research, Nov/Dec 2000, Vol. 40(6), 79-83.

Webb, D. J., Green, C. L., & Brashear, T. G. (2000). Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 299-309.

----------------------------------------

Authors

Beverly T. Venable, East Carolina University
Gregory M. Rose, The University of Mississippi
Faye W. Gilbert, The University of Mississippi



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 30 | 2003



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Vicarious Pride: When Gift Customization Increases Recipients’ Appreciation of the Gift

Marta Pizzetti, Università della Svizzera Italiana
Michael Gibbert, Università della Svizzera Italiana

Read More

Featured

Conducting Consumer-Relevant Research

Jeffrey Inman, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Margaret C. Campbell, University of Colorado, USA
Amna Kirmani, University of Maryland, USA
Linda L Price, University of Oregon, USA

Read More

Featured

Effortful but Valuable: How Perceptions of Effort Affect Charitable Gift Choice and Valuations of Charity

Haesung Annie Jung, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Marlone Henderson, University of Texas at Austin, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.