Fostering Cooperation on the Internet: Social Exchange Processes in Innovative Virtual Consumer Communities


Andrea Hemetsberger (2002) ,"Fostering Cooperation on the Internet: Social Exchange Processes in Innovative Virtual Consumer Communities", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 29, eds. Susan M. Broniarczyk and Kent Nakamoto, Valdosta, GA : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 354-356.

Advances in Consumer Research Volume 29, 2002     Pages 354-356


Andrea Hemetsberger, Innsbruck University


It has been argued that consumers’ involvement in value creating activities is still underestimated and constitutes a gap in marketing theory (Wikstr÷m, 1996; Tzokas and Saren, 1997; Firat and Venkatesh, 1995; Gummesson, 1998). With the communication facilities of the Internet at hand consumers homesteaded new platforms for social interaction and their creative activities have become more visible and extensive. An outstanding example is the open-source community. Collaborating via Internet, thousands of expert programmers and millions of users worldwide voluntarily develop and improve on open-source software.

The purpose of this research is to conceptualize and explore the specific contents and process of cooperative exchange relationships on the Internet. Exploratory evidence is based on more than 1400 responses to a Websurvey among the members of the open-source community.


Marketing literature offers various conceptualizations about how to design exchange relationships (Bagozzi, 1975; Hirschman, 1987; Morgan and Hunt, 1994; Gr÷nroos, 1999). The 'economic model’ assumes that things are exchanged for their utilitarian value, whereas according to the 'social model’ exchange takes place on the basis of the symbolic value attached to things (Ekeh, 1974, Bagozzi, 1975). Whereas most economic transactions are simultaneous exchanges, social exchanges are rather based on a general hope for future favors and social approval. Reciprocation is regulated through the establishment of injunctive and/or descriptive social norms (Cialdini et al., 1990; 1991) resulting in moral obligation (Ezioni, 1975) or doing what is done in a particular social context, respectively. Belk and Coon (1993) challenged the paradigmatic assumption of reciprocity in exchange models and introduced an altruistic explanation for gift-giving behavior. Pure gifts are given without expectations of anything in return (Mauss et al., 1970).


Schouten/McAlexander (1995, p.43) argued that "activities and associated interpersonal relationshipsthat give life meaning" are "The most powerful organizing forces in modern life". The more central an object or activity is to a person, the more likely the person will be to pursue and value membership in a virtual community. (Kozinets 1999). Depending on the degree of involvement with the activity and the strenght of social ties, member participation in virtual communities will vary.

Anderson et al. (1999) further argue that we enter into interaction with others in an effort to control the conditions of our own life. Voluntary work provides the means to struggle against " the inability of individuals to significantly alter the state of the world around them" (Thompson and Bono, 1993, p.328).

Gaining knowledge and increased career prospects constitute important motivations for volunteering (Thompson and Bono, 1993; Lerner and Tirole, 2000). However, on the Internet it is the delivery rather than the possession of resources which is decisive for exchange to occur. Giving valuable resources away may be explained by the collaborative ethic of a community. A more direct reward is provided by recognition and social approval (Blau, 1964; Fisher and Ackerman, 1998; Raymond, 1999). However, individuals differ in their expertise and the social rewards received. It is proposed that the cognitive and behavioral model of exchange and gift-giving and thus, its selfish or altruistic quality is determined by the degree to which individuals own a surplus of those 'assets’.


A Websurvey - designed and administered by a core member of the open-source community - was analyzed. Respondents were asked to report freely about their involvement with open-source, their motivations to participate and what kind of projects they are involved in. Structuring content-analysis was used for categorization of the responses. Analysis of the exchange process was done by cross-analysis specifically focusing on relationships between categories.


Content analysis revealed five categories of motives for voluntary engagement in a collaborative on-line project. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, especially the joyful and challenging task performed, and gaining knowledge are prevalent among respondents. Common goals and values, communal relationships and an individual’s meaning of exchange determine the extent of contribution.

Interestingly, the most selfish as well as the most altruistic motivation to contribute rank highest and equal in the main contributor group. Notwithstanding the importance of "The thrill of the hack", they nevertheless put equal emphasis on the achievement of the common goal. Although main contributors are experts, gaining knowledge represents one of the main motivations, however, without career concerns. The social reward for their engagement and help is the reputation gained. Strong social ties and a liberal and/or humanistic ethos provide the emotional background for their commitment. A generally more selfish attitude is expressed by individuals who contribute less. A stronger concern for personal gain, career concerns, expected reciprocity and weaker social ties and values characterizes them. The motivations to contribute are to 'return the favor’ as well as to 'help others’. Although seemingly different constructs, there exists no incongruency in individual’s minds. Gaining knowledge is the common motivation that unifies contributors of all kind.


Several key elements of exchange are decisive for creative on-line communities to exist and survive. Firstly, exchange is equally based on selfish, equity-based as well as altruistic attitude. Contrary to findings in research on volunteering feelings of moral obligation rarely occurred. However, a strong descriptive norm to give back the favor in the long run and helping others provide the basis for sustained generalized exchange. Secondly, and decisive for exchange to occur is a community’s knowledge base. The community’s innovative power results from accumulating member-generated expertise and multiplying it by giving it away. This constitues a self-sustaining educational system. Thirdly, contribution behavior is highly rewarded with social approval. In contrast to 'real-world’ volunteers, contributors in on-line projects can see their efforts come to fruition quickly and harvest positive feed-back from users all over the globe. This enhances feelings of self-worth, contributing to a worthwhile cause and confirm the community’s ability to alter the state of the world. It is these social rewards combined with a liberal and humanistic culture that ensures a steady flow of contributions and keeps the self-sustaining system of exchange alive.


Anderson, Wilton Th., Challagalla, Goutam N. and Richard G. McFarland (1999). "Anatomy of Exchange," Journal of Marketing Theory and ractice (Fall), 8-19.

Antaki, Charles (1988). "Structures of Belief and Justification," in: Antaki, Charles (ed.), Analysing Everyday Explanation B A Casebook of Methods, London: Sage Publications, 61-73.

Armstrong, A. and J. Hagel III (1996). "The real value of on-line communities," Harvard Business Review, (May-June), 134-141.

Bagozzi, Richard P. (1974), "Marketing as an Organized Behavioral System of Exchange", Journal of Marketing, Vol.38 (October), 77-81.

Bagozzi, Richard P. (1975), "Marketing as Exchange", Journal of Marketing, Vol.39 (October), 32-39.

Bandura, Albert (ed.) (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Belk, Russel W. and Gregory S. Coon (1993). "Gift-Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences," Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol.20 (December), 393-417.

Bettencourt, Lance A. (1997). "Customer Voluntary Performance: Customers as Partners in Service Delivery," Journal of Retailing, Vol.73, No.3 (Fall), 383-408.

Blau, Peter M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Bloch, Peter H (1986). "The Product Enthusiast: Implications for Marketing Strategy," The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.3 (Summer), 51-63.

Bollier, David (1999). "The Power of Openness," working paper, Berkman Center for Internet and Society,, 1-27. accessed December 7th, 2000.

Cialdini, Robert B, Reno, Raymond R. and Carl A. Kallgren (1990). "A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places,"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.58, 1015-1026.

Cialdini, Robert B., Kallgren, Carl A. and Raymond R. Reno (1991). "A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior" in: Leonard Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.24, 201-214.

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1997). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, New York: HarperPerennial.

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2000). "The Costs and Benefits of Consuming," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.27 (September), 267-272.

Deutsch, Morton (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Diekmann, Andreas (1985). "Volunteer’s Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.29, 605-610.

Diekmann, Andreas (1986). "Volunteer’s Dilemma: A social trap without a dominant strategy and some empirical results," in: A. Diekmann and P. Mitter (eds.). Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior: Essays in Honor of Anatol Rapaport, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 97-103.

Durkheim, Emile (1973). De la division du travail social, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Ekeh, Peter P. (1974). Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Etzioni, Amitai (1975). Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations (enlarged ed.), New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.

Fernando, Jude L. and Alan W. Heston (eds.) (1997). The Role of NGOs: Charity and Empowerment, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Fernback, Jan (1999). "There Is a There There. Notes Toward a Definition of Cybercommunity," in: Steve Jones (ed.). Doing Internet Research. Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Firat, A. Fuat and Alladi Venkatesh (1995). "Liberatory Postmoderism and the Reenchantment of Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22 (December), 239-267.

Fisher, Robert J. (1993). "Socially Desirable Responding and The Validity of Indirect Questioning," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20 (September), 303-315.

Fisher, Robert J. and David Ackerman (1998). "The Effects of Recognition and Group Need on Volunteering: A Social Norm Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25 (December), 262-275.

Foa, Edna B. and Uriel G. Foa (1980). "Resource Theory: Interpersonal Behavior as Exchange," in: Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, and R. H. Willis (eds.) New York: Plenum Press.

Forrester, Russ (2000). "Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea," Academy of Management Executive, Vol.14, No.3, 67-80.

Gr÷nroos, Christian (1999). "Relationship Marketing: Challenges for the Oganization," Journal of Business Research, Vol.46, 327-335.

Gummesson, Evert (1998). Implementation Requires a Relationship Marketing Paradigm, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.26, No.3, 242-249.

Haas, David F. and Forrest A. Deseran (1981). "Trust and Symbolic Exchange," Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol.44 (March), 3-13.

Hirschman, Elizabeth C. (1987). "People as Products: Analysis of a Complex Marketing Exchange," Journal of Marketing, Vol.51 (January), 98-108.

Holbrook, Morris, B. (1994). The Nature of Customer Value, in: Roland T. Rust and Richard L. Oliver (eds.), Service Quality: new directions in theory and practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 21-71.

Holt, Douglas B. (1995). "How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22, June, 1-16.

Kabanoff, Boris (1991). "Equity, Equality, Power, and Conflict," Academy of Management Review, Vol.16, No.2, 416-441.

Kassarjian, Harold H. (1977). "Content Analysis in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 4 (June), 8-18.

Kelley, Scott W., James H. Donnelly, Jr., and Steven J. Skinner (1990). "Customer Participation in Service Production and Delivery," Journal of Retailing, Vol.66 (Fall), 315-335.

Kelley, Scott W., Steven J. Skinner and James H. Donnelly, Jr. (1992). "Organizational Socialization of Service Customers," Journal of Business Research, Vol.25 (November), 197-214.

Kolbe, Richard H. and Melissa S. Burnett (1991). "Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.18 (September), 243-250.

Kollock, Peter and Marc A. Smith (1998). Communities in Cyberspace, London: Routledge.

Kotler, Philip J. (1997). Marketing Management Analysis, Planning , and Control, 9th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.

Kozinets, Robert V. (1999). "E-Tribalized Marketing?: The Strategic Implications of Virtual Communities on Consumption," European Management Journal, Vol.17, No.3 (June), 252-264.

Kuwabara, Ko (2000). "Linux: A Bazaar at the Edge of Chaos," firstmonday, Vol. 5, Nr. 3 (March),http:/, 1-61.

Lakhani, Karim and Eric von Hippel (2000). "How Open Source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance," MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper#4117, 1-39.

Lawler, Edward. E. (1986). High involvement management, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lerner, Josh and Jean Tirole (2000). "The Simple Economics of Open Source," Working Paper (February), 1-39.

March, James G. and Herbert A. Simon (1958). Organizations, New York: Wiley.

Marwell, Oliver (1982). "Altruism and the Problem of Collective Action," in: Valerian J. Derlega and Janusz Grzelak (eds.), Cooperation and Helping Behavior, New York: Academic Press, 207-226.

Mauss, Marcel, Ian Cunnison and Edward E. Evans-Pritchard (1970). The gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Mesch, Debra J., Mary Tschirhart, James L. Perry and Geunjoo Lee (1998). Altruists or Egoists? Retention in Stipended Service," Nonprofit Management & Leadership, Vol.9, No.1 (Fall), 3-21.

Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, July, 20-38.

Murninghan, J. Keith, Jae Wook Kim and A. Richard Metzger (1993). "The Volunteer Dilemma," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.38, 515-538.

Olsen, Marvin E. (1978). The Process of Social Organization B Power in Social Systems, US: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 2nd ed.

Olson, Mancur (1965). The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

O’Reilly & Associates (1999). Open Source, Koeln: O’Reilly & Associates.

Patton, Michael Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed., Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

Raymond, Eric S. (1999). The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA.

Rheingold, Howard (2000). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, revised edition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Schneider, Benjamin and David E. Bowen (1995). Winning the Service Game, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Schouten, John W. and James H. McAlexander (1995). "Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.22 (June), 43-61.

Stirrat, R. L. and H. Henkel (1997). "The Development Gift: The Problem of Reciprocity in the NGO World," in: Jude L. Fernando and Alan W. Heston (eds.), The Role of NGOs: Charity and Empowerment, The

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November, 1997, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 66-80.

Thompson, Alexander M. and Barbara A. Bono (1993). "Work Without Wages: The Motivation of Volunteer Firefighters," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol.52, No.3, 323-343.

Thompson, Craig J. and Diana L. Haytko (1997). "Speaking of Fashion: Consumers’ Uses of Fashion Discourses and the Appropriation of Countervailing Cultural Meanings," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24 (June), 15-42.

Tzokas, Nikolaos and Michael Saren (1997). Building Relationship Platforms in Consumer Markets: A Value Chain Approach, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol.5, No.2, 105-120.

van Oorschot, Wim (1999). "The Legitimacy of Welfare: A Sociological Analysis of Motives for Contributing to Welfare Schemes." Working Paper for De Toekomst Van De Sociale Zekerheid, Universiteit Antwerpen, December, 1-24.

van Rossum, Guido (1999). "Interview with van Rossum," in: O’Reilly & Associates (1999). Open Source, Koeln: O’Reilly & Associates, 45-48.

von Hippel, Eric (1988). Sources of Innovation, New York:Oxford University Press.

von Hippel, Eric (1998). "Economics of Product Development by Users: The Impact od "Sticky" Local Information," Management Science, Vol.40, No.4 (April), 429-439.

Walster, Elaine, G., William Walster, Ellen Berscheid and William Austin (1978). Equity: theory and research, Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon.

West, Michael A. and Wieby M.M. Altink (1996). "Innovation at Work: Individual, Group, Organizational, and Socio-historical Perspectives," European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 3-11.

Wikstr÷m, Solveig (1996). "Value Creation by Company-Consumer Interaction," Journal of Marketing Management, Vol.12, 359-374.



Andrea Hemetsberger, Innsbruck University


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 29 | 2002

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Data... the 'Hard' & 'Soft' of it: Impact of Embodied Metaphors on Attitude Strength

Sunaina Shrivastava, University of Iowa, USA
Gaurav Jain, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
JaeHwan Kwon, Baylor University
Dhananjay Nayakankuppam, University of Iowa, USA

Read More


Q8. Avatars, Consumers and Possession in Online Gaming

Feihong Hu, Lancaster University, UK
Xin Zhao, Lancaster University, UK
Chihling Liu, Lancaster University, UK

Read More


The Embodiment of Repair: Consumer Experiences of Material Singularity and Practice Disruption

Matthew Godfrey, University of Arizona, USA
Linda L Price, University of Oregon, USA
Robert F. Lusch, University of Arizona, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.