If We Know the Difference What’S the Harm? the Effects of Brand Equity Misappropriation and Dilution
EXTENDED ABSTRACT - Recently, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of a small store against a world-famous lingerie manufacturer and retailer. The owners of the little shop, which sells lingerie and other Aadult novelty@ items, named their store AVictors Secret.@ Shortly after opening, they were sued by Victorias Secret, claiming protection of its brand name under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995. Trademark dilution refers to a decrease in brand equity (in the senior brand) that is created by the unauthorized use of the brand by a third party (the junior brand). Trademark dilution differs from the more familiar concept of trademark infringement in that it occurs in the absence of consumer confusion about the relationship between the senior and junior brands.
Citation:
Chris P. Pullig, Carolyn J. Simmons, and Richard G. Netemeyer (2004) ,"If We Know the Difference What’S the Harm? the Effects of Brand Equity Misappropriation and Dilution", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 31, eds. Barbara E. Kahn and Mary Frances Luce, Valdosta, GA : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 654-655.
Authors
Chris P. Pullig, Baylor University
Carolyn J. Simmons, Washington and Lee University
Richard G. Netemeyer, University of Virginia
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 31 | 2004
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Beyond Subjectivity: Competing Governance Regimes and the Socio-Material Construction of Rational Consumer Action
Lena Pellandini-Simanyi, Università della Svizzera Italiana
Featured
When Perceiving Oneself as a Spender Increases Saving
Emily Garbinsky, University of Notre Dame, USA
Nicole Mead, University of Melbourne, Australia
Featured
Exploring the Intersection of Digital Virtual Consumption and Family Rituals
Linda Tuncay Zayer, Loyola University Chicago, USA
Jenna Drenten, Loyola University Chicago, USA