Sensitivity to Gains and Losses in Financial Decision Making: the Ubiquitous Influence of Promotion Vs. Prevention Goals
ABSTRACT - Individual investors financial decisions are largely influenced by pervasive, asset-specific, but mostly implicit goals. Extending Regulatory Focus Theory (Higgins, 1997) to the financial decision making domain, we propose that investors relative concern for advancement and growth (promotion focus) versus safety and security (prevention focus) varies systematically across financial instruments. In particular, stock investments prime implicit goals that are primarily promotion-focused (i.e., gain seeking), whereas IRA fund investments prime implicit goals that are primarily prevention-focused (i.e., loss avoidance). These predictions were tested in a large-scale experiment among 198 real-world private investors. Consistent with the predictions, the results show that, in decisions involving stocks, investors show a disproportionate concern for potential gains and a relative disregard for potential losses. In contrast, in decisions involving IRA funds, investors show a disproportionate concern for potential losses and a relative disregard for potential gains.
Citation:
Rongrong Zhou (2001) ,"Sensitivity to Gains and Losses in Financial Decision Making: the Ubiquitous Influence of Promotion Vs. Prevention Goals", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 28, eds. Mary C. Gilly and Joan Meyers-Levy, Valdosta, GA : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 15.
Individual investors financial decisions are largely influenced by pervasive, asset-specific, but mostly implicit goals. Extending Regulatory Focus Theory (Higgins, 1997) to the financial decision making domain, we propose that investors relative concern for advancement and growth (promotion focus) versus safety and security (prevention focus) varies systematically across financial instruments. In particular, stock investments prime implicit goals that are primarily promotion-focused (i.e., gain seeking), whereas IRA fund investments prime implicit goals that are primarily prevention-focused (i.e., loss avoidance). These predictions were tested in a large-scale experiment among 198 real-world private investors. Consistent with the predictions, the results show that, in decisions involving stocks, investors show a disproportionate concern for potential gains and a relative disregard for potential losses. In contrast, in decisions involving IRA funds, investors show a disproportionate concern for potential losses and a relative disregard for potential gains. ----------------------------------------
Authors
Rongrong Zhou, Columbia University
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 28 | 2001
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
When Small Predicts Large: The Effect of Initial Small Contributions on Subsequent Contributions in a Crowdfunding Project
Tingting Fan, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Leilei Gao, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Featured
Shared Values, Trust, and Consumers’ Deference to Experts
Samuel Johnson, University of Bath, UK
Max Rodrigues, DePaul University, USA
David Tuckett, University College London
Featured
Deprivation of Control and the Phonetic Appeal of Brand Names
Jamel Khenfer, Zayed University
Caroline Cuny, Grenoble Ecole de Management