Summary of Special Session Self-Gifts: an Emerging Category of Consumer Behavior From Multiple Perspectives
Citation:
David Mick (1993) ,"Summary of Special Session Self-Gifts: an Emerging Category of Consumer Behavior From Multiple Perspectives", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 20, eds. Leigh McAlister and Michael L. Rothschild, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 546.
SELF-GIFTS: AN EMERGING CATEGORY OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR FROM MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES The first paper by McGrath, Sherry, and Levy emanated from a cultural-anthropological and motivational-research perspective. Using sentence completion tasks and a story-telling technique, these researchers found that magic, mystery, ambivalence, and indulgence are associated with self-gifts, just as they are with interpersonal gifts. Guilt emerged as a potential consequence, more so than in prior research, whereas themes of self-esteem, specialness, and perfect choices were also discerned, corroborating prior findings by Mick and DeMoss. The second paper by Olshavsky and Lee offered an information processing explanation of self-gifts based on meta-cognitionB awareness of one's own cognitive processesCwhich implies the dimension of self-communication in self-gifts. The authors argue that if a person is aware of his/her cognitive state, then that person can influence the cognitive/emotional integrity of his/her information processing system through self-gift behavior. They conclude that, while a new theory to explain self-gifts is unnecessary, the major contribution of self-gift research has been the recognition of a new consumer motivation that cannot be readily traced to Maslow's hierarchy of needs. The third paper by Faure and Mick reviewed prior self-gift research and Weiner's attribution theory of motivation and emotion to derive several predictions about self-gift likelihood following achievement task outcomes. For example, they proposed that certain emotions (e.g., pride, guilt) and a sense of deservingness will mediate the influence of achievement outcomes (success/failure) and causal attributions (locus, controllability) on self-gift likelihood. They also discuss different methodological options for testing their hypotheses. The fourth paper by Shapiro reported survey results that indicated that individuals with an internal (external) locus of control engage in more (less) therapeutic self-gift behavior. He explained this finding in terms of Deci's self-determination theory, i.e., internals may be more inclined to take action to repair their emotional states with therapeutic self-gifts. The discussant for this special session, Dennis Rook, raised several important questions about the concept and research of self-gifts. For example, he asked "If you manage to get someone else to buy you a gift that you really want, is it a self-gift?" The possibility of compulsive therapeutic self-gifts was also raised in discussion, and Mick argued that this notion is oxymoronic, i.e., any gifting activity that is out of control is probably not perceived by the gift recipient as authentic gift giving. Rook concluded by calling for more grounded theory and naturalistic research on self-gifts. ----------------------------------------
Authors
David Mick, University of Florida
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 20 | 1993
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Surprise! The Positive Impact of Uncertainty on the Evaluation of Experiential Purchases
Iñigo Gallo, IESE Business School
LILY JAMPOL, Queen Mary University of London
Alberto Rampullo, IESE Business School
Thomas Gilovich, Cornell University, USA
Featured
Pro-Environmental Waste Receptacle Labeling Can Increase Recycling Contamination
Jesse R. Catlin, California State University, Sacramento
Yitong Wang, University of Technology Sydney
Rommel J. Manuel, California State University, Sacramento
Featured
Promoting Well-being and Combating Harassment in the Academy
Ekant Veer, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Zeynep Arsel, Concordia University, Canada
June Cotte, Ivey Business School
Jenna Drenten, Loyola University Chicago, USA
Markus Geisler, York University, Canada
Lauren Gurrieri, RMIT University
Julie L. Ozanne, University of Melbourne, Australia
Nicholas Pendarvis, California State University Los Angeles, USA
Andrea Prothero, University College Dublin
Minita Sanghvi, Skidmore College
Rajiv Vaidyanathan, University of Minnesota Duluth, USA
Stacy Wood, North Carolina State University