Ai Is Blamed More Than Humans When It Falters, But Less So When It Discriminates

While people are reluctant to use AI (artificial intelligence)-based decision agents, little research has examined blame assignment when such agents falter. In two studies, we find that while AI agents are generally blamed more than humans for adverse outcomes, they garner lesser blame and lower moral outrage for discriminatory behaviour.



Citation:

Tripat Gill, Sakshi Korde, and Shirley (Shuo) Chen (2021) ,"Ai Is Blamed More Than Humans When It Falters, But Less So When It Discriminates", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 49, eds. Tonya Williams Bradford, Anat Keinan, and Matthew Matthew Thomson, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 931-931.

Authors

Tripat Gill, Wilfrid Laurier University
Sakshi Korde, Wilfrid Laurier University
Shirley (Shuo) Chen, Wilfrid Laurier University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 49 | 2021



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

The Re-Mediation of Consumer/Brand Relationships Through Voice Shopping: The Case of Amazon Echo

Johanna Franziska Gollnhofer, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

Read More

Featured

Consuming Time-Space Imaginations: Bakhtin’s Chronotope on Robots and Artificial Intelligence

Marat Bakpayev, University of Minnesota Duluth, USA
Alima Yesmukanova, KIMEP University

Read More

Featured

Teaching Old Dog New Tricks… and Old Bottles New Jeans. The Role of Implicit Theories in the Evaluation of Recycled Products

Alessandro Biraglia, University of Leeds
J. Josko Brakus, University of Leeds
Lucia Mannetti, Sapienza University of Rome
Ambra Brizi, Sapienza University of Rome

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.