Anthropomorphism and Virtual Assistants’ Mistakes: Who Is to Blame?

This research investigates whether anthropomorphizing a virtual assistant (VA) influences attribution of blame followed by a mistake. Our findings suggest that anthropomorphism decreases the likelihood of consumers blaming the VA as opposed to its developing company. We suggest that anthropomorphism increases empathy towards VAs, leading to the proposed main effect.



Citation:

Bianca Kato, Juan Wang, and Jing Wan (2021) ,"Anthropomorphism and Virtual Assistants’ Mistakes: Who Is to Blame?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 49, eds. Tonya Williams Bradford, Anat Keinan, and Matthew Matthew Thomson, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 906-906.

Authors

Bianca Kato, University of Guelph
Juan Wang, University of Guelph
Jing Wan, University of Guelph



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 49 | 2021



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Beyond Subjectivity: Competing Governance Regimes and the Socio-Material Construction of Rational Consumer Action

Lena Pellandini-Simanyi, Università della Svizzera Italiana

Read More

Featured

P7. Consumer Evaluations of Sale Prices: The Role of the Spatial Representation of Time

Yaeeun Kim, Temple University, USA
Joydeep Srivastava, Temple University, USA

Read More

Featured

Mispredicting Reactions to Gambling Losses and Their Impact on Consumer Choice

Ernest Baskin, Yale University, USA
Nathan Novemsky, Yale University, USA
Robyn LeBoeuf, Washington University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.