Inequality Aversion: Is Being Wrongful to "All" Fairer Than Being Wrongful to "Some"?
We find that the inequality aversion is so strong in people (particularly among women) that they find systems and decisions that are wrongful-to-all to be fairer, more moral, and better than systems that are wrongful-to-some, even though the wrongful-to-all treatment is potentially one with lower overall welfare.
Hoori Rafieian (2021) ,"Inequality Aversion: Is Being Wrongful to "All" Fairer Than Being Wrongful to "Some"?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 49, eds. Tonya Williams Bradford, Anat Keinan, and Matthew Matthew Thomson, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 899-899.
Hoori Rafieian, Fordham University
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 49 | 2021
A Computational Social Science Framework for Visualizing the Possibility Space of Consumer-Object Assemblages from IoT Interaction Data
Donna Hoffman, George Washington University, USA
Thomas Novak, George Washington University, USA
Only "$20 More": Additional Price Framing Increases the Choice of Upgraded Products and Services
Thomas Allard, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Dale Griffin, University of British Columbia, Canada
The Role of Expectations About Changes in Wealth in Discounting Decisions
Abigail Sussman, University of Chicago, USA
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA
Shweta Desiraju, University of Chicago, USA