How Donor’S Regulatory Focus Changes the Effectiveness of a Sadness-Evoking Charity Appeal

Across eight studies, we find that a prevention (vs. promotion) focus discourages charitable giving when it is solicited using a sadness appeal, whereas regulatory focus does not affect the giving when other emotion appeals (e.g., happiness appeal or guilt appeal) are used.



Citation:

jungsil choi and *Hyun Young Park (2020) ,"How Donor’S Regulatory Focus Changes the Effectiveness of a Sadness-Evoking Charity Appeal ", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 285-286.

Authors

jungsil choi, Cleveland State University
*Hyun Young Park, CEIBS



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Predicting Consumer Brand Recall and Choice Using Large-Scale Text Corpora

Zhihao Zhang, University of California Berkeley, USA
Aniruddha Nrusimha, University of California Berkeley, USA
Ming Hsu, University of California Berkeley, USA

Read More

Featured

Perspectives on “What Can We Trust? Perceptions of, and Responses to, Fake Information” and the Changing Values of Information

Kristen Lane, University of Arizona, USA
Merrie Brucks, University of Arizona, USA

Read More

Featured

Mispredicting Reactions to Gambling Losses and Their Impact on Consumer Choice

Ernest Baskin, Yale University, USA
Nathan Novemsky, Yale University, USA
Robyn LeBoeuf, Washington University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.