Consumers Respond to Artificial Intelligence Recommendations: Experiential Vs. Material Framing

We propose that framing AI recommendations as experiences (vs. materially) alleviates algorithm aversion. Across experiments using AI platforms, we find that AI recommendations diminish evaluations for materially framed offerings, but enhance evaluations for experientially framed offerings because experiential framing counteracts algorithm aversion by enhancing the self-relevance of an AI recommendation.



Citation:

Nadia Danienta and Aric Rindfleisch (2020) ,"Consumers Respond to Artificial Intelligence Recommendations: Experiential Vs. Material Framing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 295-296.

Authors

Nadia Danienta, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Aric Rindfleisch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

E3. Having Power, Giving More? The Effect of Psychological Power on Consumers’ Charitable Giving of Time

Wumei Liu, Lanzhou University

Read More

Featured

Semantic Processes in Memory-Based Consumer Decision Making

Sudeep Bhatia, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

K5. Advertising Organizational Culture as a Selling Tactic for For-Profit Organizations

Dejun Tony Kong, University of Houston, USA
Maria Ng, University of Houston, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.