Can Side-By-Side Comparisons Compromise Decision Outcomes? a Construal-Level View of Evaluation-Mode Effects

Should consumers evaluate their choice options one at a time or simultaneously to make best consumption decisions? Counter to naïve intuition, our research shows that side-by-side comparisons can undermine decision outcomes by lowering the level of construal and raising the importance of secondary attributes during product evaluation and choice.



Citation:

Olya Bryksina and na xiao (2020) ,"Can Side-By-Side Comparisons Compromise Decision Outcomes? a Construal-Level View of Evaluation-Mode Effects", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 234-235.

Authors

Olya Bryksina, University of Winnipeg
na xiao, Laurentian University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Don’t Tell Me Who I Am! When and How Assigning Consumers an Identity Backfires

Noah Castelo, Columbia University, USA
Kirk Kristofferson, Ivey Business School
Kelley Main, University of Manitoba, Canada
Katherine White, University of British Columbia, Canada

Read More

Featured

What a Waste: Effects of Food Consumption Choices and Traffic Light Labelling on Disposal

Marit Drijfhout, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Jenny van Doorn, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Koert van Ittersum, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Read More

Featured

F13. A Story of Waste: Trust, Symbolic Adoption & Sustainable Disposal

Marwa Gad Mohsen, Babson College, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.