Can Side-By-Side Comparisons Compromise Decision Outcomes? a Construal-Level View of Evaluation-Mode Effects

Should consumers evaluate their choice options one at a time or simultaneously to make best consumption decisions? Counter to naïve intuition, our research shows that side-by-side comparisons can undermine decision outcomes by lowering the level of construal and raising the importance of secondary attributes during product evaluation and choice.



Citation:

Olya Bryksina and na xiao (2020) ,"Can Side-By-Side Comparisons Compromise Decision Outcomes? a Construal-Level View of Evaluation-Mode Effects", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 234-235.

Authors

Olya Bryksina, University of Winnipeg
na xiao, Laurentian University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Q7. Desire in Performed Consumption: Examining the Case of Korean Beauty Vlogging

Marie-Eve Jodoin, HEC Montreal, Canada
Marie-Agnès Parmentier, HEC Montreal, Canada

Read More

Featured

Understanding Consumer Sensory Preferences: An Ethnographic Investigation of Sensory Flamboyance and Subtlety in India

Tanuka Ghoshal, Baruch College, USA
Russell W. Belk, York University, Canada

Read More

Featured

Good Gets Better, Bad Gets Worse: The Polarizing Effect of Rating a Consumption Experience

Nahid Ibrahim, University of Alberta, Canada
Gerald Häubl, University of Alberta, Canada
Rory Waisman, University of Alberta, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.