How Consumers Respond to Artificial Intelligence Recommendations: Experiential Vs. Material Framing
We propose that framing AI recommendations as experiences (vs. materially) alleviates algorithm aversion. Across experiments using AI platforms, we find that AI recommendations diminish evaluations for materially framed offerings, but enhance evaluations for experientially framed offerings because experiential framing counteracts algorithm aversion by enhancing the self-relevance of an AI recommendation.
Citation:
Nadia Danienta and Aric Rindfleisch (2020) ,"How Consumers Respond to Artificial Intelligence Recommendations: Experiential Vs. Material Framing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 296-296.
Authors
Nadia Danienta, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Aric Rindfleisch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Financial Education and Confidence in Financial Knowledge
Stephen Atlas, University of Rhode Island
Nilton Porto, University of Rhode Island
Jing Jian Xiao, University of Rhode Island
Featured
Consumer Response to Innovations: The Differential Effects of Focused and Defocused Attention on Perceived Novelty, Usefulness and Symbolism
Katarina Hellén, Univeristy of Vaasa
Maria Sääksjärvi, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Featured
Growing Up Rich and Insecure Makes Objects Seem Human: Childhood Material and Social Environments Predict Anthropomorphism
Jodie Whelan, York University, Canada
Sean T. Hingston, York University, Canada
Matthew Thomson, Western University, Canada
Allison R. Johnson, Western University, Canada