How Consumers Respond to Artificial Intelligence Recommendations: Experiential Vs. Material Framing

We propose that framing AI recommendations as experiences (vs. materially) alleviates algorithm aversion. Across experiments using AI platforms, we find that AI recommendations diminish evaluations for materially framed offerings, but enhance evaluations for experientially framed offerings because experiential framing counteracts algorithm aversion by enhancing the self-relevance of an AI recommendation.



Citation:

Nadia Danienta and Aric Rindfleisch (2020) ,"How Consumers Respond to Artificial Intelligence Recommendations: Experiential Vs. Material Framing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 296-296.

Authors

Nadia Danienta, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Aric Rindfleisch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Visualizing Price Magnitude: How Slider Scales Change Willingness-to-Pay

Manoj Thomas, Cornell University, USA
Ellie Kyung, Dartmouth College, USA

Read More

Featured

The Upside of Incompetence: How Discounting Luxury Affects Retailer Price Image

Karen Wallach, Emory University, USA
Ryan Hamilton, Emory University, USA
morgan k ward, Emory University, USA

Read More

Featured

Dancing with Commercialism: Emphasizing Dramatism to Persuade

Yuxin Bai, Lancaster University, UK
Xin Zhao, Lancaster University, UK
Hayley Cocker, Lancaster University, UK

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.