Brand Extension Failure and Parent Brand Penalty: the Role of Implicit Theories

In the current research, five studies support the premise that consumers’ implicit theory orientation influences the severity of negative feedback effects following an extension failure. Entity (vs. incremental) theorists penalize parent brands more after a failed extension due to their belief that brands have higher (vs. lower) entitativity.



Citation:

Shailendra Pratap Jain, Pragya Mathur, Mathew S. Isaac, Huifang Mao, and Durairaj Maheswaran (2020) ,"Brand Extension Failure and Parent Brand Penalty: the Role of Implicit Theories", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 851-856.

Authors

Shailendra Pratap Jain, University of Washington, USA
Pragya Mathur, Baruch College, USA
Mathew S. Isaac, Seattle University, USA
Huifang Mao, Iowa State University, USA
Durairaj Maheswaran, New York University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

To Apologize, or Not to Apologize? That is A Question - How Should an Organization Respond to Executive Employees’ Private Life Misconduct?

Zayed Bin Islam, University of Guelph, Canada
Juan Wang, University of Guelph, Canada
Towhidul Islam, University of Guelph, Canada

Read More

Featured

A Model of Consumer Self-Regulation Failure

Keith Wilcox, Columbia University, USA

Read More

Featured

‘Family Tech-Support’: Consequences for Family Assemblages and Non-Purchase Decision Technology Adoption

Pao Franco, University of Melbourne, Australia

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.