Getting Nothing Feels Fairer Than Getting Something: How Allocation Outcomes Invoke Different Allocation Rules

We investigate perceived fairness regarding resource allocation between two entities in a performance-based setting. We find that people perceive allocating no resource (vs. a small compensation amount) to the low performer to be fairer. The mechanism concerns the extent to which each allocation conforms to the allocation rule it invokes.



Citation:

Minzhe Xu and Bowen Ruan (2020) ,"Getting Nothing Feels Fairer Than Getting Something: How Allocation Outcomes Invoke Different Allocation Rules", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 794-795.

Authors

Minzhe Xu, University of Florida, USA
Bowen Ruan, University of Iowa, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

O11. Have Less, Compromise Less: How the perception of resource scarcity influences compromise decisions

Kate Kooi, University of Miami, USA
Caglar Irmak, University of Miami, USA

Read More

Featured

O10. Individual Differences in Consumers' Need For Cognition and Affect: A Neuromarketing Study Using Voxel-Based Morphometry

Jianping Huang, Tsinghua University
Yang Sun, Tsinghua University
Jie Sui, University of Bath, UK
Xiaoang Wan, Tsinghua University

Read More

Featured

How Well Do Consumer-Brand Relationships Drive Customer Brand Loyalty? Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of Brand Relationship Elasticities

Mansur Khamitov, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
Matthew Thomson, Western University, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.