Impression Management in the Echo-Chamber: How Self-Censorship Biases Evidence-Sharing

Two preregistered experiments (N=819) find evidence of self-censorship effects in information-sharing among political allies: Consumers omit from conversation evidence they believe to be factual and relevant to important social issues (e.g., gun control, climate change) if bringing up such evidence might cast public doubt on their loyalty to valued political causes.



Citation:

Ike Silver, Deborah Small, and Geoffrey Goodwin (2020) ,"Impression Management in the Echo-Chamber: How Self-Censorship Biases Evidence-Sharing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 863-867.

Authors

Ike Silver, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Deborah Small, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Geoffrey Goodwin, University of Pennsylvania, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

N8. Effect of Awe on Collectable Consumer Experience

Eujin Park, Washington State University, USA
Andrew Perkins, Washington State University, USA
Betsy Howlett, Washington State University, USA

Read More

Featured

Cohesion or Coercion? Why Coordinated Behavior Backfires in Marketing Contexts

Noah VanBergen, University of Cincinnati, USA

Read More

Featured

The Self-Perception Connection: Why Consumers Devalue Unattractive Produce

Lauren Grewal, Dartmouth College, USA
Jillian Hmurovic, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Cait Lamberton, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Rebecca Walker Reczek, Ohio State University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.