Assimilative Versus Complementary Effects of Embodied Verticality: Neural and Behavioral Evidence

Four experiments resolve apparent discrepancies in previous work on the effects of verticality. Our conceptual model, based on a goal systems framework and supported by experimental and EEG evidence, explains the divergence in past research by introducing the distinction between static and dynamic phenomena in the study of embodied cognition.



Citation:

Massimiliano Ostinelli, David Luna, Torsten Ringberg, and Seidi Suurmets (2020) ,"Assimilative Versus Complementary Effects of Embodied Verticality: Neural and Behavioral Evidence", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1074-1079.

Authors

Massimiliano Ostinelli, Winthrop University
David Luna, University of Central Florida, USA
Torsten Ringberg, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
Seidi Suurmets, Copenhagen Business School



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Self-Producer`s Journey: Identity Construction and Transformation in Self-Production

S. Sinem Atakan, Ozyegin University, Turkey
Mina Seraj, Ozyegin University, Turkey

Read More

Featured

D12. Future Decisions and Temporal Contiguity Cues: When Absence of Temporal Contiguity Cues Increases Online Reviews’ Persuasiveness.

Francesco Zanibellato, Ca' Foscari University, Venice, Italy

Read More

Featured

Losing Fast or Slow? Preferences for Uncertainty Resolution

Kurt P. Munz, New York University, USA
Alixandra Barasch, New York University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.