To Err Is Human, to Correct Is Algorithmic

Across three studies and nine scenarios, we observe that people believe that algorithmic errors can be corrected, however, they do not believe that human errors can be similarly corrected. More specifically, people trust a previously erring algorithm after correction but lose confidence in an erring human even after correction.



Citation:

Chengyao Sun and Cynthia Cryder (2020) ,"To Err Is Human, to Correct Is Algorithmic", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1227-1227.

Authors

Chengyao Sun, Washington University, USA
Cynthia Cryder, Washington University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

J13. The Good and Bad of a Delayed Indulgence: Effects on Self-Perceptions and Purchase Satisfaction

Argiro Kliamenakis, Concordia University, Canada
Kamila Sobol, Concordia University, Canada

Read More

Featured

L8. Recover the Unrecoverable: How Co-Recovery Shifts Consumers ‘Attribution Following a Failed Recovery

Bo Huang, HEC Montreal, Canada
Yany Grégoire, HEC Montreal, Canada
Matthew Philp, HEC Montreal, Canada

Read More

Featured

D2. When a Negative Review Can Help the Company: the Role of the Unfairness and Empathy

Maria Alice Pasdiora, UFRGS
Cristiane Pizzutti, UFRGS
Natalia Englert, UFRGS

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.