To Err Is Human, to Correct Is Algorithmic
Across three studies and nine scenarios, we observe that people believe that algorithmic errors can be corrected, however, they do not believe that human errors can be similarly corrected. More specifically, people trust a previously erring algorithm after correction but lose confidence in an erring human even after correction.
Citation:
Chengyao Sun and Cynthia Cryder (2020) ,"To Err Is Human, to Correct Is Algorithmic", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1227-1227.
Authors
Chengyao Sun, Washington University, USA
Cynthia Cryder, Washington University, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
N14. The Bright Side of Sadness: How Mood Affects Goal Initiation
Yunqing Chen, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Leilei Gao, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Featured
K3. Goal or Knowledge? Exploring the Nature of Culture and its Consequential Effect
Xiaohua Zhao, Tsinghua University
Fang Wan, University of Manitoba, Canada
Antonios Stamatogiannakis, IE Business School, IE University
Haiyang Yang, Johns Hopkins University
Featured
K12. Use language to change people’s mind: The persuasive power of online marketing communications
Xun He, Katholieke University Leuven, Belgium
Barbara Briers, Vlerick Business School
Luk Warlop, Norwegian School of Management, Norway