Consumer Response to Nutrition Claims: Focus on Adding Good Or Removing Bad

Through a meta-analysis and two experiments, we show that consumers differentiate between nutrition claims focused on the addition of positive nutrients vs. removal of negative nutrients. We offer evidence that this effect is driven by perceived value for money. This brings implications to academic, marketers and policymakers.



Citation:

Iina Ikonen, Aylin Aydinli, and Peeter Verlegh (2020) ,"Consumer Response to Nutrition Claims: Focus on Adding Good Or Removing Bad", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 422-424.

Authors

Iina Ikonen, University of Bath, UK
Aylin Aydinli, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peeter Verlegh, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Material Gifts as Relationship Mnemonics: Why More Material Gifts Are Given Than Wanted?

Adelle Xue Yang, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Minjung Koo, Sungkyunkwan University
JAEWON HWANG, Sejong University

Read More

Featured

Financial Education and Confidence in Financial Knowledge

Stephen Atlas, University of Rhode Island
Nilton Porto, University of Rhode Island
Jing Jian Xiao, University of Rhode Island

Read More

Featured

K6. Persuading the Moral Consumer: Matching Messages to Attitude Basis

Aviva Philipp-Muller, Ohio State University, USA
Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.