Consumer Response to Nutrition Claims: Focus on Adding Good Or Removing Bad
Through a meta-analysis and two experiments, we show that consumers differentiate between nutrition claims focused on the addition of positive nutrients vs. removal of negative nutrients. We offer evidence that this effect is driven by perceived value for money. This brings implications to academic, marketers and policymakers.
Citation:
Iina Ikonen, Aylin Aydinli, and Peeter Verlegh (2020) ,"Consumer Response to Nutrition Claims: Focus on Adding Good Or Removing Bad", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 422-424.
Authors
Iina Ikonen, University of Bath, UK
Aylin Aydinli, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peeter Verlegh, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
C8. Can Packaging Imagery Fill Your Stomach? Effects of Product Image Location on Flavor Richness, Consumption Quantity, and Subsequent Choice
Taku Togawa, Chiba University of Commerce
Jaewoo Park, Musashi University
Hiroaki Ishii, Seikei University
Xiaoyan Deng, Ohio State University, USA
Featured
Digital Storytelling and Post-Trust Online Sperm Marketing
Jennifer Takhar, Institut Supérieur de Gestion, Paris, France.
Laetitia Mimoun, HEC Paris, France
Featured
O13. Pain of Loss: How Losing in a Promotional Competition Influences Consumer Attitude
Arash Talebi, ESSEC Business School
Sonja Prokopec, ESSEC Business School
Ayse Onculer, ESSEC Business School