Effect Sizes in Experimental Consumer Psychology Are Underestimated: Introducing a Simple Correction
Effect sizes in experimental consumer psychology are systematically underestimated because the dominant estimation strategy ignores the ‘reliability’ of the experimental manipulation (i.e., the squared correlation between manipulation and independent variable). It is shown how to correct for this bias in published articles even when raw data are not available.
Citation:
Walter Herzog and Christopher Beisecker (2020) ,"Effect Sizes in Experimental Consumer Psychology Are Underestimated: Introducing a Simple Correction", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 402-403.
Authors
Walter Herzog, WHU
Christopher Beisecker, WHU
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Beyond Subjectivity: Competing Governance Regimes and the Socio-Material Construction of Rational Consumer Action
Lena Pellandini-Simanyi, Università della Svizzera Italiana
Featured
N10. How Does It Make You Feel? Emotional Reasoning and Consumer Decisions
Andrea Rochelle Bennett, University of North Texas
Blair Kidwell, University of North Texas
Jonathan Hasford, University of Central Florida, USA
David Hardesty, University of Kentucky, USA
Molly Burchett, University of Kentucky, USA
Featured
Guilt Undermines Consumer Willingness to Buy More Meaningful Time
Ashley V. Whillans, Harvard Business School, USA
Elizabeth W. Dunn, University of British Columbia, Canada