Effect Sizes in Experimental Consumer Psychology Are Underestimated: Introducing a Simple Correction
Effect sizes in experimental consumer psychology are systematically underestimated because the dominant estimation strategy ignores the ‘reliability’ of the experimental manipulation (i.e., the squared correlation between manipulation and independent variable). It is shown how to correct for this bias in published articles even when raw data are not available.
Citation:
Walter Herzog and Christopher Beisecker (2020) ,"Effect Sizes in Experimental Consumer Psychology Are Underestimated: Introducing a Simple Correction", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 402-403.
Authors
Walter Herzog, WHU
Christopher Beisecker, WHU
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
O2. The Streaking Star Effect: Why People Want Individual Winning Streaks to Continue More than Group Streaks
Jesse Walker, Cornell University, USA
Thomas Gilovich, Cornell University, USA
Featured
Perceptions of Epistemic vs. Aleatory Uncertainty Affect Stock Investment
Daniel Walters, INSEAD, France
Gulden Ulkumen, University of Southern California, USA
Carsten Erner, FS Card
David Tannebaum, University of Utah, USA
Craig Fox, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Featured
The psychological impact of annuities: Can pension payout choice influence health behavior?
Anja Schanbacher, London Business School, UK
David Faro, London Business School, UK
Simona Botti, London Business School, UK
Shlomo Benartzi, University of California Los Angeles, USA