Effect Sizes in Experimental Consumer Psychology Are Underestimated: Introducing a Simple Correction
Effect sizes in experimental consumer psychology are systematically underestimated because the dominant estimation strategy ignores the ‘reliability’ of the experimental manipulation (i.e., the squared correlation between manipulation and independent variable). It is shown how to correct for this bias in published articles even when raw data are not available.
Citation:
Walter Herzog and Christopher Beisecker (2020) ,"Effect Sizes in Experimental Consumer Psychology Are Underestimated: Introducing a Simple Correction", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 402-403.
Authors
Walter Herzog, WHU
Christopher Beisecker, WHU
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
I’m Just Trying to Help: How Volunteers’ Social Media Posts Alter Support for Charitable Organizations
Michelle Daniels, Arizona State University, USA
Kirk Kristofferson, Ivey Business School
Andrea Morales, Arizona State University, USA
Featured
P5. Can(Can’t) Control, thus Try to Save (Earn): The Joint Effect of Perceived Control and Financial Deprivation on Financial Decisions
Min Jung Kim, Manhattan College
Featured
D3. Social Exclusion and WOM about Past versus Future Experiences
Melis Ceylan, Koc University, Turkey
Ezgi Akpinar, Koc University, Turkey
Selin Atalay, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Germany