Firing Founders That Behave Badly: Effects of Morality Versus Authenticity on Brand Evaluation

When a company’s founder engages in ethical misconduct, the company can fire the founder in hopes that the brand’s reputation maintains its integrity. This article demonstrates that the removal of the founder still damages the brand through competing effects of both the company’s perceived morality and perceived authenticity.



Citation:

Lan Anh N Ton and Rosanna Smith (2020) ,"Firing Founders That Behave Badly: Effects of Morality Versus Authenticity on Brand Evaluation", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 732-734.

Authors

Lan Anh N Ton, University of Georgia, USA
Rosanna Smith, University of Georgia, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Beyond Needs and Wants: How Networked Hyper-rational Economic Actors “Win” the Deal but “Lose” the Shopping Trip

Colin Campbell, University of San Diego, USA
Hope Schau, University of Arizona, USA

Read More

Featured

Finding Happiness in Meaning and Meaning in Happiness: Where, When, and For Whom Happiness and Meaning Converge

Rhia Catapano, Stanford University, USA
Jordi Quoidbach, ESADE Business School, Spain
Cassie Mogilner, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Jennifer Aaker, Stanford University, USA

Read More

Featured

A Model of Consumer Self-Regulation Failure

Keith Wilcox, Columbia University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.