The Effects of Similarities- Vs Differences-Focus on Fake News Processing

The fight against fake news currently lacks working interventions. This study explores individual cognitive differences to pave the way towards such interventions. Relying on comparison theory, hypotheses test the effects of similarities- and differences proneness. Findings suggest that these factors indeed influence cognitive processing – if not summative truth and confidence judgments.



Citation:

Gergely Nyilasy and Bernice Plant (2020) ,"The Effects of Similarities- Vs Differences-Focus on Fake News Processing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1217-1217.

Authors

Gergely Nyilasy, University of Melbourne, Australia
Bernice Plant, Monash University, Australia



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Cultural Values and Consumers’ Brand Preference

Jessie J. Wang, Miami University, Ohio
Ashok K Lalwani, Indiana University, USA
Devon DelVecchio, Miami University, Ohio

Read More

Featured

When News Gets Personal: The Evolution of Content in the Successive Retelling of Events

Shiri Melumad, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Yoon Duk Kim, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Robert Meyer, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Ani Nenkova, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

Once? No. Twenty times? Sure! Uncertainty and precommitment in social dilemmas

David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Howard Kunreuther, University of Pennsylvania, USA
David Krantz, New York University, USA
Poonam Arora, Manhattan College
Amir Sepehri, Western University, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.