In Groups (Vs. Markets) We Trust: Relying on Groups Or Information Markets to Aggregate Knowledge
Many organizations are replacing groups (e.g., traditional committees) with information markets to aggregate knowledge. However, we show that groups outperform (vs. underperform) markets when conflicts-of-interest are absent (vs. present). Novice forecasters don’t anticipate these results and generally trust groups more than markets, but experience with information markets reverses this tendency.
Citation:
Boris Maciejovsky and David Budescu (2020) ,"In Groups (Vs. Markets) We Trust: Relying on Groups Or Information Markets to Aggregate Knowledge", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 842-846.
Authors
Boris Maciejovsky, University of California Riverside, USA
David Budescu, Fordham University
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
E10. Sustainable Initiatives: Cultural Identity, Regulatory Focus, and Construal Perspective
Ekaterina Salnikova, Aarhus University
Yuliya Strizhakova, Rutgers University, USA
Klaus G Grunert, Aarhus University
Featured
R14. Are Lonely Consumers Loyal Consumers? Loneliness Breadth and Depth
Eunyoung Jang, Oklahoma State University, USA
Zachary Arens, Oklahoma State University, USA
Featured
M5. The More Expensive a Gift Is, the More It Is Appreciated? The Effect of Gift Price on Recipients’ Appreciation
Jooyoung Park, Peking University
MENGSHU CHEN, Tencent Holdings Limited