Igoofed: How Consumers Assign Blame in Response to Ai Accidents
Artificially intelligent (AI) agents are becoming pervasive in a variety of domains, which means AI accidents will become increasingly common. Across four studies this research examines the “AI blame penalty” – the tendency for consumers to blame and punish AI agents and their companies more than human agents following accidents.
Citation:
Rebecca J Krause-Galoni, Derek Rucker, and Aparna A Labroo (2020) ,"Igoofed: How Consumers Assign Blame in Response to Ai Accidents", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48, eds. Jennifer Argo, Tina M. Lowrey, and Hope Jensen Schau, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 467-468.
Authors
Rebecca J Krause-Galoni, Northwestern University, USA
Derek Rucker, Northwestern University, USA
Aparna A Labroo, Northwestern University, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 48 | 2020
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
R9. The Asymmetric Effects Of Attitude Toward The Brand (Symbolic Vs. Functional) Upon Recommendation System (Artificial Intelligence Vs. Human)
Kiwan Park, Seoul National University, USA
Yaeri Kim, Seoul National University, USA
Seojin Stacey Lee, Seoul National University, USA
Featured
Vicarious Pride: When Gift Customization Increases Recipients’ Appreciation of the Gift
Marta Pizzetti, Università della Svizzera Italiana
Michael Gibbert, Università della Svizzera Italiana
Featured
Consumer Reluctance Toward Medical Artificial Intelligence: The Underlying Role of Uniqueness Neglect
Chiara Longoni, Boston University, USA
Andrea Bonezzi, New York University, USA
Carey K. Morewedge, Boston University, USA