17C Running Risks in Someone Else’S Shoes: a Meta-Analysis on Self-Others Discrepancies in Risky Decisions
Are consumers more risk-seeking for decisions affecting others or themselves? To answer this question, a meta-analysis was conducted on 182 effect sizes. While decision-makers are less risk-seeking for others in loss-framed conditions, uncertainty-avoidant cultures and for distant others, they are more risk-seeking when themselves or one other person are affected.
Citation:
Alex Belli (2019) ,"17C Running Risks in Someone Else’S Shoes: a Meta-Analysis on Self-Others Discrepancies in Risky Decisions", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 959-959.
Authors
Alex Belli, Australian Catholic University, Australia
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
A Meta-Analysis on the Endowment Effect in Experiments
DANIEL SUN, University of Calgary, Canada
Featured
L7. The Joy of Shopping: Reconciling Mixed Effects of Positive Emotions on Shopping Behavior
Kelley Gullo, Duke University, USA
Duncan Simester, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA
Featured
O3. The Effect of Numeric Information on Product Evaluation
Zhen Yang, Drexel University, USA
Yanliu Huang, Drexel University, USA
Dengfeng Yan, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA