When Experiences Go Badly: the Buffering Effect of Scheduling on Dissatisfaction

The author proposes that scheduling can reduce dissatisfaction when an experience goes badly. Six studies demonstrate that consumers expect to be more satisfied with scheduled (vs. impromptu) experiences, and this higher anchor leads to greater satisfaction and positive word of mouth when something goes poorly within an experience.



Citation:

Gabriela Tonietto (2019) ,"When Experiences Go Badly: the Buffering Effect of Scheduling on Dissatisfaction", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 337-341.

Authors

Gabriela Tonietto, Rutgers University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

N13. Smaller Self but Larger Tips? The Effect of Awe on Consumers’ Tipping Intention

Ran Li, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China

Read More

Featured

F11. Anti-Consumption for Sustainability: The Environmental Impact of Anti-Consumption Lifestyles, Environmentally Concerned Individuals and Ethical Consumers

Laurie Touchette, HEC Montreal, Canada
Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno, HEC Montreal, Canada

Read More

Featured

Walking the Thin Edge: The Dark Side of Brand Communities and Collecting

Emily Chung, RMIT University
Marcia Christina Ferreira, Brunel University
daiane scaraboto, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.