Patient For Candy Or Cash? the Robustness of Impatience Across Affect-Rich and Affect-Poor Resources

Extensive prior research concludes that affect-rich goods inspire more impatience. However, the prior findings confound discounting and diminishing marginal utility. Five studies that either measure and correct for or avoid the confound find no differences in present bias, but lower long-run discounting (more patience) for goods than money.



Citation:

Oleg Urminsky and Timothy Kim (2019) ,"Patient For Candy Or Cash? the Robustness of Impatience Across Affect-Rich and Affect-Poor Resources", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 309-314.

Authors

Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA
Timothy Kim, University of Chicago, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Mining Consumer Minds: How Airbnb Hosts’ Motivations Affect Their Retention and Pricing Decision

Jaeyeon Chung, Columbia University, USA
Gita Venkataramani Johar, Columbia University, USA
Yanyan Li, Columbia University, USA
Oded Netzer, Columbia University, USA
Matthew Pearson, Former User Experience Researcher at Airbnb

Read More

Featured

A3. Why People Still Do Not Trust Algorithmic Advice in Decision Making

JAEWON HWANG, Sejong University
Dong Il Lee, Sejong University

Read More

Featured

P4. Consistent Price Endings Increase Consumers Perceptions of Cheapness

Shih-Chieh Chuang, National Chung Cheng University
Yin-Hui Cheng, National Taichung University of Education

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.