The Better Path Not Taken: Goal-Setting Undermines Opportunity Cost Consideration

We demonstrate that setting goals can decrease the likelihood of switching to dominant outside alternatives. People who set a goal are both less likely to attend to outside alternatives, and are more likely to devalue non-goal alternatives. Setting broader goals dampens this effect but does not fully attenuate it.


Elizabeth Friedman, Minju Han, Guy Voichek, and Ravi Dhar (2019) ,"The Better Path Not Taken: Goal-Setting Undermines Opportunity Cost Consideration", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 206-211.


Elizabeth Friedman, Columbia University, USA
Minju Han, Yale University, USA
Guy Voichek, Yale University, USA
Ravi Dhar, Yale University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Explaining the Attraction Effect: An Ambiguity-Attention-Applicability Framework

Sharlene He, Concordia University, Canada
Brian Sternthal, Northwestern University, USA

Read More


I5. Take That Mirror Away From me! Clothing Consumption by the Elderly and the Self-identity of the Young

Daniela Ferreira, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Read More


A Journey with no Return into the Animal Kingdom: The Role of Tattooing in the Construction of the Collective Identity of the Vegan and Vegetarian Movement

Renata Andreoni Barboza, IBMEC-Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais
Tania Modesto Veludo-de-Oliveira, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EAESP)

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.