Beyond Striving: on Maximizing, Choice Disfluency, and Regulatory Fit
We show that choice disfluency evokes regulatory fit for maximizers, whereas fluency evokes fit for satisficers. This evoked feeling of fit, in turn, activates a general action goal which influences consequential choices and real donations, carries over across domains, and is subject to goal rebound effects.
Citation:
Felipe M. Affonso and Aner Sela (2019) ,"Beyond Striving: on Maximizing, Choice Disfluency, and Regulatory Fit", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 425-426.
Authors
Felipe M. Affonso, University of Florida, USA
Aner Sela, University of Florida, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Dancing with Commercialism: Emphasizing Dramatism to Persuade
Yuxin Bai, Lancaster University, UK
Xin Zhao, Lancaster University, UK
Hayley Cocker, Lancaster University, UK
Featured
D10. It's Meant for Me: When Serendipity Increases Word-of-Mouth
Colleen Patricia Kirk, New York Institute of Technology
Joann Peck, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Claire Hart, University of South Hampton, UK
Constantine Sedikides, University of South Hampton, UK
Featured
M1. How Rewarding is Your Rewards Program? Experiential vs. Material Rewards
Ayalla Ruvio, Michigan State University, USA
Farnoosh Khodakarami, Michigan State University, USA
Clay Voorhees, Michigan State University, USA