Decision Making For Others Involving Risk: a Review and Meta-Analysis
Researchers across the social sciences have asked: Are choices for others riskier than choices people make for themselves? In a meta-analysis of 112 effects from 62 papers (totaling 12,964 observations), we found a significant effect size (d = 0.100) in favor of a risky shift when people choose for others.
Evan Polman and Kaiyang Wu (2019) ,"Decision Making For Others Involving Risk: a Review and Meta-Analysis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 813-816.
Evan Polman, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Kaiyang Wu, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019
Testing Theories of Goal Progress within Online Learning
Tong Lu, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Eric Bradlow, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Wesley Hutchinson, University of Pennsylvania, USA
The Impact of Anthropomorphized Cute Brands on Consumer Preferences for Distinctive and Majority-Endorsed Products
Marina Puzakova, Lehigh University
Nevena T Koukova, Lehigh University
Ioannis Evangelidis, Bocconi University, Italy
Stijn M. J. van Osselaer, Cornell University, USA