Decision Making For Others Involving Risk: a Review and Meta-Analysis

Researchers across the social sciences have asked: Are choices for others riskier than choices people make for themselves? In a meta-analysis of 112 effects from 62 papers (totaling 12,964 observations), we found a significant effect size (d = 0.100) in favor of a risky shift when people choose for others.



Citation:

Evan Polman and Kaiyang Wu (2019) ,"Decision Making For Others Involving Risk: a Review and Meta-Analysis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 813-816.

Authors

Evan Polman, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Kaiyang Wu, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

O12. When do People Waste Time? Testing a Mechanism for Parkinson’s Law.

Holly S Howe, Duke University, USA
Tanya Chartrand, Duke University, USA

Read More

Featured

Algorithm Attraction versus Aversion: The Role of the Perceived Self-Efficacy of the Decision Maker

Gizem Yalcin, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Anne-Kathrin Klesse, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Darren Dahl, University of British Columbia, Canada

Read More

Featured

J10. Transnational Consumer Lifestyle

zahra Sharifonnasabi, Queen Mary University of London
Fleura Bardhi, City University of London, UK

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.