Decision Making For Others Involving Risk: a Review and Meta-Analysis

Researchers across the social sciences have asked: Are choices for others riskier than choices people make for themselves? In a meta-analysis of 112 effects from 62 papers (totaling 12,964 observations), we found a significant effect size (d = 0.100) in favor of a risky shift when people choose for others.



Citation:

Evan Polman and Kaiyang Wu (2019) ,"Decision Making For Others Involving Risk: a Review and Meta-Analysis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 813-816.

Authors

Evan Polman, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Kaiyang Wu, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Testing Theories of Goal Progress within Online Learning

Tong Lu, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Eric Bradlow, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Wesley Hutchinson, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

The Impact of Anthropomorphized Cute Brands on Consumer Preferences for Distinctive and Majority-Endorsed Products

Marina Puzakova, Lehigh University
Nevena T Koukova, Lehigh University

Read More

Featured

Compatibility Theory

Ioannis Evangelidis, Bocconi University, Italy
Stijn M. J. van Osselaer, Cornell University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.