Risky Business: the Risk-Reward Trade-Off Is Different For Nonprofit and For-Profit Firms

We find that consumers penalize nonprofits that choose a risky (but high expected value) option over a certain (but low expected value) option, however, they do not similarly penalize for-profit companies that choose the same risk. This pattern occurs because risk-taking activates paternalistic attitudes toward nonprofit organizations, decreasing support.



Citation:

Rachel Gershon, Cynthia Cryder, and Merriah Croston (2019) ,"Risky Business: the Risk-Reward Trade-Off Is Different For Nonprofit and For-Profit Firms", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 93-98.

Authors

Rachel Gershon, University of California San Diego, USA
Cynthia Cryder, Washington University, USA
Merriah Croston, Washington University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Believing in and Reacting to Rumors: The Role of Congruity and Nature of Existing Predisposition

Satadruta Mookherjee, SUNY Binghamton, USA
Subimal Chatterjee, SUNY Binghamton, USA

Read More

Featured

Can Making Family Salient Improve Retirement Contributions? Evidence from Field Experiments in Mexico

Avni Shah, University of Toronto, Canada
Matthew Osborne, University of Toronto, Canada
Jaclyn Lefkowitz, IDEAS42
Andrew Fertig, IDEAS42
Dilip Soman, University of Toronto, Canada
Nina Mazar, Boston University, USA

Read More

Featured

I6. How Does Runner’s World Shape a Runner’s World? Understanding Representations of the “Ideal” Female Body in Fitness Advertising

Carly Drake, University of Calgary, Canada
Scott Radford, University of Calgary, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.