Risky Business: the Risk-Reward Trade-Off Is Different For Nonprofit and For-Profit Firms

We find that consumers penalize nonprofits that choose a risky (but high expected value) option over a certain (but low expected value) option, however, they do not similarly penalize for-profit companies that choose the same risk. This pattern occurs because risk-taking activates paternalistic attitudes toward nonprofit organizations, decreasing support.



Citation:

Rachel Gershon, Cynthia Cryder, and Merriah Croston (2019) ,"Risky Business: the Risk-Reward Trade-Off Is Different For Nonprofit and For-Profit Firms", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47, eds. Rajesh Bagchi, Lauren Block, and Leonard Lee, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 93-98.

Authors

Rachel Gershon, University of California San Diego, USA
Cynthia Cryder, Washington University, USA
Merriah Croston, Washington University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 47 | 2019



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Don’t Forget the Accountant: Role-Integration Increases the Fungibility of Mentally Accounted Resources

Iman Paul, Georgia Tech, USA
Jeffrey Parker, Georgia State University, USA
Sara Loughran Dommer, Georgia Tech, USA

Read More

Featured

How Eyes Pull on the Heartstrings: Averted Eye Gaze Enhances Narrative Transportation and Self-Brand Connection

Ngoc To, University of Houston, USA
Vanessa Patrick, University of Houston, USA

Read More

Featured

Immigration, Abortion, and Gay Marriage – Oh My!

TJ Weber, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Chris Hydock, Georgetown University, USA
Jeff Joireman, Washington State University, USA
David Sprott, Washington State University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.