Moral Arguments Are Most Persuasive in Changing Attitudes of Opponents of Genetically Modified Foods

Across 4 studies, we systematically examine which types of arguments cause opponents of GMO foods to change their minds. Moral arguments shifted opponents’ attitudes more than arguments about its safety, naturalness, or acceptability in Christian doctrine, which is consistent with the possibility that attitudes are based on the moralization of GMO foods.



Citation:

Sydney Scott, Yoel Inbar, and Paul Rozin (2018) ,"Moral Arguments Are Most Persuasive in Changing Attitudes of Opponents of Genetically Modified Foods", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 115-120.

Authors

Sydney Scott, Washington University, USA
Yoel Inbar, University of Toronto, Canada
Paul Rozin, University of Pennsylvania, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Stigma at Every Turn: Exploring Bi+ Consumer Experiences

Abigail Jean Nappier Cherup, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Andre F. Maciel, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Read More

Featured

K12. Use language to change people’s mind: The persuasive power of online marketing communications

Xun He, Katholieke University Leuven, Belgium
Barbara Briers, Vlerick Business School
Luk Warlop, Norwegian School of Management, Norway

Read More

Featured

A11. When Political Neutrality Backfires

Ike Silver, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Alex Shaw, University of Chicago, USA
Rob Kurzban, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.