A Taxonomy of Opposition to Genetically Modified Foods

In two studies we explore reasons for opposing genetically modified foods, and evidence for why traditional interventions have been unsuccessful. Results suggest that subjective knowledge is an important predictor of GM food opposition (in interaction with objective knowledge), and that the psychology of opposition is more complex than previously thought.



Citation:

Philip M. Fernbach, Nicholas Light, and Lauren Min (2018) ,"A Taxonomy of Opposition to Genetically Modified Foods", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 115-120.

Authors

Philip M. Fernbach, University of Colorado, USA
Nicholas Light, University of Colorado, USA
Lauren Min, University of Colorado, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

“I Desire A Brand When I See How They are Different from Me”: Differential Effects of Blatant and Subtle Brand Rejection

Jun Yan, University of Manitoba, Canada
Fang Wan, University of Manitoba, Canada
Americus Reed, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

The Neutral Face of Blue: How Color Can Make Consumers Stay Sensitive

Sung Hee Wendy Paik, University of Oregon, USA
Jiao Zhang, University of Oregon, USA
Aparna Sundar, University of Oregon, USA

Read More

Featured

R9. The Asymmetric Effects Of Attitude Toward The Brand (Symbolic Vs. Functional) Upon Recommendation System (Artificial Intelligence Vs. Human)

Kiwan Park, Seoul National University, USA
Yaeri Kim, Seoul National University, USA
Seojin Stacey Lee, Seoul National University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.