When the Ends Do Not Justify Paying For the Means: Consumers Prefer Shifting Costs From Means to Goals
Consumers frequently incur costs associated with goals (e.g., ordering a gift) and costs associated with means (e.g., paying for shipping). How do goal systems affect preferences for pricing in these goal-means “bundles”? Seven studies reveal people prefer shifting costs to goals, even when it would be economically inconsequential or costly.
Franklin Shaddy and Ayelet Fishbach (2018) ,"When the Ends Do Not Justify Paying For the Means: Consumers Prefer Shifting Costs From Means to Goals", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 318-322.
Franklin Shaddy, University of Chicago, USA
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Consumer Response to Innovations: The Differential Effects of Focused and Defocused Attention on Perceived Novelty, Usefulness and Symbolism
Katarina Hellén, Univeristy of Vaasa
Maria Sääksjärvi, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
K4. Movie Reviews and their Sentiments: Evidence of a Bandwagon Effect in Individualistic Cultures
Subimal Chatterjee, SUNY Binghamton, USA
Ning Fu, SUNY Binghamton, USA
Qi Wang, SUNY Binghamton, USA
B9. The Power of Self-Effacing Brand Messages: Building Trust and Increasing Brand Attitudes
Tessa Garcia-Collart, Florida International University
Jessica Rixom, University of Nevada, Reno