When the Ends Do Not Justify Paying For the Means: Consumers Prefer Shifting Costs From Means to Goals
Consumers frequently incur costs associated with goals (e.g., ordering a gift) and costs associated with means (e.g., paying for shipping). How do goal systems affect preferences for pricing in these goal-means “bundles”? Seven studies reveal people prefer shifting costs to goals, even when it would be economically inconsequential or costly.
Franklin Shaddy and Ayelet Fishbach (2018) ,"When the Ends Do Not Justify Paying For the Means: Consumers Prefer Shifting Costs From Means to Goals", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 318-322.
Franklin Shaddy, University of Chicago, USA
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
The Victory Effect: Is First-Place Seeking Stronger than Last-Place Aversion?
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Steven Shechter, University of British Columbia, Canada
K12. Use language to change people’s mind: The persuasive power of online marketing communications
Xun He, Katholieke University Leuven, Belgium
Barbara Briers, Vlerick Business School
Luk Warlop, Norwegian School of Management, Norway
Uncertain Reward Campaigns Impact Product Size Choices
Nükhet Taylor, York University, Canada
Theodore J. Noseworthy, York University, Canada
Ethan Pancer, Saint Mary's University