Worse Is Bad: Asymmetric Inferences on Items and Assortments From Logically Equivalent Comparisons
When comparing products, the same relation can often be framed two different ways; A is better than B, or B is worse than A. Here we investigate how the framing of these relations affects judgments of the products in question, as well as other products in the same category/assortment.
Yoel Inbar and Ellen Evers (2018) ,"Worse Is Bad: Asymmetric Inferences on Items and Assortments From Logically Equivalent Comparisons", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 318-322.
Yoel Inbar, University of Toronto, Canada
Ellen Evers, University of California Berkeley, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
A Slack-Based Account of Pain of Payment
Justin Pomerance, University of Colorado, USA
Nicholas Reinholtz, University of Colorado, USA
How Regional Diasporic Consumer Experiences Produce Transnational Imaginary
Mark Buschgens, RMIT University
Bernardo Figueiredo, RMIT University
Kaleel Rahman, RMIT University
Trusting the data, the self and “the other” in self tracking practices
Dorthe Brogård Kristensen, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark