Worse Is Bad: Asymmetric Inferences on Items and Assortments From Logically Equivalent Comparisons
When comparing products, the same relation can often be framed two different ways; A is better than B, or B is worse than A. Here we investigate how the framing of these relations affects judgments of the products in question, as well as other products in the same category/assortment.
Citation:
Yoel Inbar and Ellen Evers (2018) ,"Worse Is Bad: Asymmetric Inferences on Items and Assortments From Logically Equivalent Comparisons", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 318-322.
Authors
Yoel Inbar, University of Toronto, Canada
Ellen Evers, University of California Berkeley, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
O1. Choice, Rejection, and Context Effects
Shih-Chieh Chuang, National Chung Cheng University
Yin-Hui Cheng, National Taichung University of Education
Featured
B5. Money Doesn’t Buy Happiness, But What About Buying Trust? The Effectiveness of Financial Compensation in Restoring Trust After Double Deviation
Valentina Ortiz Ubal, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Cristiane Pizzutti, UFRGS
Katja Gelbrich, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
Featured
B9. The Power of Self-Effacing Brand Messages: Building Trust and Increasing Brand Attitudes
Tessa Garcia-Collart, Florida International University
Jessica Rixom, University of Nevada, Reno