Assuming Ordinality: Best-To-Worst Inferences in Vertical Lists

This research shows that when presented with an unnumbered vertical list of items, consumers assume that these items have been ranked and listed in “best-to-worst” order of quality or performance. Across four experiments, we find that consumers infer ordinality from verticality even when explicitly informed that display order is non-diagnostic.



Citation:

Mathew S. Isaac and SHAILENDRA PRATAP JAIN (2018) ,"Assuming Ordinality: Best-To-Worst Inferences in Vertical Lists", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 45-49.

Authors

Mathew S. Isaac, Seattle University
SHAILENDRA PRATAP JAIN, University of Washington, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

The Impostor Syndrome from Luxury Consumption

Dafna Goor, Harvard Business School, USA
Nailya Ordabayeva, Boston College, USA
Anat Keinan, Harvard Business School, USA
Sandrine Crener, Harvard Business School, USA

Read More

Featured

The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers

Chen Pundak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Jacob Goldenberg, IDC

Read More

Featured

To Touch or Not to Touch?: How Touch Influences Decision Confidence

Sang Kyu Park, University of Florida, USA
Yang Yang, University of Florida, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.