Assuming Ordinality: Best-To-Worst Inferences in Vertical Lists

This research shows that when presented with an unnumbered vertical list of items, consumers assume that these items have been ranked and listed in “best-to-worst” order of quality or performance. Across four experiments, we find that consumers infer ordinality from verticality even when explicitly informed that display order is non-diagnostic.



Citation:

Mathew S. Isaac and SHAILENDRA PRATAP JAIN (2018) ,"Assuming Ordinality: Best-To-Worst Inferences in Vertical Lists", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 45-49.

Authors

Mathew S. Isaac, Seattle University
SHAILENDRA PRATAP JAIN, University of Washington, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Intentionally “Biased”: People Purposefully Use To-Be-Ignored Information, But Can Be Persuaded Not To

Berkeley Jay Dietvorst, University of Chicago, USA
Uri Simonsohn, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations for the Endowment Effect

Peter Nguyen, Ivey Business School
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
David J. Curry, University of Cincinnati, USA

Read More

Featured

Liminal Motherhood: Relational Partners Experience of Liminality

Adriana Schneider Dallolio, Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV-EAESP
Eliane Zamith Brito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.