Good Gets Better, Bad Gets Worse: the Polarizing Effect of Rating a Consumption Experience

We find that rating a consumption experience (vs. not rating it) leads to the polarization of retrospective evaluation of that experience (i.e., positive experiences become more positive, negative experiences become more negative). We propose and find support for an ‘exemplar memory account’ of this polarizing effect across four longitudinal studies.



Citation:

Nahid Ibrahim, Gerald Häubl, and Rory Waisman (2018) ,"Good Gets Better, Bad Gets Worse: the Polarizing Effect of Rating a Consumption Experience", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 220-225.

Authors

Nahid Ibrahim, University of Alberta, Canada
Gerald Häubl, University of Alberta, Canada
Rory Waisman, University of Alberta, Canada



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Willingness to Pay: A Contextualized Method of Valuation

Sharlene He, Concordia University, Canada
Eric T. Anderson, Northwestern University, USA
Derek Rucker, Northwestern University, USA

Read More

Featured

Globalizing from the Periphery: The Role of Consumer Paratextual Translation

Angela Gracia B. Cruz, Monash University, Australia
Yuri Seo, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Itir Binay, Monash University, Australia

Read More

Featured

The Effects of Breadth of Product Categories on Budgeting

An Tran, University of La Verne
John Lynch, University of Colorado, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.