Disgusting? No, Just Different. Understanding Consumer Skepticism Towards Sustainable Food Innovations

Consumers reject sustainable consumption alternatives like lab-meat or insects based on disgust, arguing these are unnatural or disease carriers. Resembling standard disgust elicitors, prior research has embraced these rationales. We, however, observe that consumers find abnormal foods disgusting for being abnormal and seek reasons supporting their disgust-induced rejection post hoc.



Citation:

Jan Andre Koch, Koert van Ittersum, and Jan Willem Bolderdijk (2018) ,"Disgusting? No, Just Different. Understanding Consumer Skepticism Towards Sustainable Food Innovations", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 654-655.

Authors

Jan Andre Koch, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Koert van Ittersum, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Jan Willem Bolderdijk, University of Groningen, The Netherlands



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Scope Insensitivity in Debt Repayment

Daniel Mochon, Tulane University, USA
Nina Mazar, Boston University, USA
Dan Ariely, Duke University, USA

Read More

Featured

Examining the Link between Predicted Identity Change and Future Well-Being

Joseph Reiff, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Hal Hershfield, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Jordi Quoidbach, ESADE Business School, Spain

Read More

Featured

A7. Credible Critters: Source and Message Expectancy Violation and Influence on Perceived Trustworthiness and Credibility

Justin Graeber, University of Texas at Austin, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.