Disgusting? No, Just Different. Understanding Consumer Skepticism Towards Sustainable Food Innovations

Consumers reject sustainable consumption alternatives like lab-meat or insects based on disgust, arguing these are unnatural or disease carriers. Resembling standard disgust elicitors, prior research has embraced these rationales. We, however, observe that consumers find abnormal foods disgusting for being abnormal and seek reasons supporting their disgust-induced rejection post hoc.



Citation:

Jan Andre Koch, Koert van Ittersum, and Jan Willem Bolderdijk (2018) ,"Disgusting? No, Just Different. Understanding Consumer Skepticism Towards Sustainable Food Innovations", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 654-655.

Authors

Jan Andre Koch, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Koert van Ittersum, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Jan Willem Bolderdijk, University of Groningen, The Netherlands



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Dancing with Commercialism: Emphasizing Dramatism to Persuade

Yuxin Bai, Lancaster University, UK
Xin Zhao, Lancaster University, UK
Hayley Cocker, Lancaster University, UK

Read More

Featured

The Effects of Glossy Versus Matte Imagery on Consumers’ Decision Making

Yoonho Jin, INSEAD, Singapore
Amitava Chattopadhyay, INSEAD, Singapore

Read More

Featured

H7. Too Risky to Be Luxurious: Stigmatized Luxury Product Attributes Can Weaken or Increase Social Risk to Determine Conspicuous Consumption

Jerry Lewis Grimes, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Yan Meng, Grenoble Ecole de Management

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.