Saving For Experiences Versus Material Goods

Consideration of future experiential (vs. material) consumption better encourages consumers to save. In a field experiment with financial-service customers, emphasis on experiential purchases generated greater interest in saving. Further, in two scenario-based experiments, participants allocated more money to saving when considering an aspirational experience, compared to a material good.



Citation:

Grant E. Donnelly, Masha Ksendzova, and Michael Norton (2018) ,"Saving For Experiences Versus Material Goods", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 323-327.

Authors

Grant E. Donnelly, Harvard Business School, USA
Masha Ksendzova, Boston University, USA
Michael Norton, Harvard Business School, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

The Dark Side of Luxury: The Social Costs of Conspicuous Consumption

Christopher Cannon, Northwestern University, USA
Derek Rucker, Northwestern University, USA

Read More

Featured

Ritual Scholarship in Marketing: Past, Present and Future

Cele Otnes, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Linda Tuncay Zayer, Loyola University Chicago, USA
Robert Arias, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Arun Sreekumar, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA

Read More

Featured

“A Tale of Two Secrets”: Examining the Diverging Effects of Secrecy on Consumption Enjoyment

Xiaojing Yang, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA
Xiaoyan Deng, Ohio State University, USA
Lei Jia, Ohio State University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.