K6. Persuading the Moral Consumer: Matching Messages to Attitude Basis
We explored the persuasive effects of moral versus practical counter-attitudinal messages on individuals with varying levels of moral conviction toward recycling. Across two studies, when pro-recycling moral conviction was high, the moral (vs. practical) anti-recycling message was more persuasive, but the effects reversed when moral conviction was low.
Citation:
Aviva Philipp-Muller, Andrew Luttrell, and Richard Petty (2018) ,"K6. Persuading the Moral Consumer: Matching Messages to Attitude Basis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 925-925.
Authors
Aviva Philipp-Muller, Ohio State University, USA
Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
R3. In Experiences We Trust: From Brand-centric Experiences to Experience-centric Brands
Melissa Archpru Akaka, University of Denver
Ana Babic Rosario, University of Denver
Gia Nardini, University of Denver
Featured
Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations for the Endowment Effect
Peter Nguyen, Ivey Business School
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
David J. Curry, University of Cincinnati, USA
Featured
Doing Good by Buying from a Peer: When and Why Consumers Prefer Peer Economy Purchases
John P. Costello, Ohio State University, USA
Rebecca Walker Reczek, Ohio State University, USA