K6. Persuading the Moral Consumer: Matching Messages to Attitude Basis
We explored the persuasive effects of moral versus practical counter-attitudinal messages on individuals with varying levels of moral conviction toward recycling. Across two studies, when pro-recycling moral conviction was high, the moral (vs. practical) anti-recycling message was more persuasive, but the effects reversed when moral conviction was low.
Citation:
Aviva Philipp-Muller, Andrew Luttrell, and Richard Petty (2018) ,"K6. Persuading the Moral Consumer: Matching Messages to Attitude Basis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 925-925.
Authors
Aviva Philipp-Muller, Ohio State University, USA
Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Consumers' response to branded longevity
Anthony Moussa, Paris School of Business
Virginie de Barnier, IAE AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY
Featured
How Incremental Theory Enhances or Reduces Charitable Giving
Alyssa Yoon, Korea University, Korea
Jongwon Park, Korea University, Korea
Featured
D11. A Hidden Cost of Advocating: Attitude Depolarization After Recommending
Ravini Savindya Abeywickrama, University of Melbourne, Australia
Gergely Nyilasy, University of Melbourne, Australia
Simon M. Laham, University of Melbourne, Australia