When Disadvantage Is an Advantage: Benevolent Partiality in Consumer Donations
A sizable number of donors value saving the lives of members of disadvantaged groups more than what disadvantage implies from a utilitarian impartiality standpoint. Benevolent partiality is decreased when donors reflect on how they should donate beforehand, when disadvantage is self-determined, and when donors are more approving of instrumental harm.
Citation:
Gabriele Paolacci and Gizem Yalcin (2018) ,"When Disadvantage Is an Advantage: Benevolent Partiality in Consumer Donations", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 740-741.
Authors
Gabriele Paolacci, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Gizem Yalcin, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
N3. Emotion Regulation and Memory for Negative Emotion Ads
Sandra Segal, Ben Gurion University, Israel
Hila Riemer, Ben Gurion University, Israel
Shai Danziger, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Gal Sheppes, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Featured
Assemblages of Denim: Transforming from Mundane to Remarkable Consumption Object
Eminegül Karababa, Middle East Technical University
Mahmut Sami Islek, Eskisehir Osmangazi University
Ufuk Ay, KTO Karatay University
Featured
O10. Individual Differences in Consumers' Need For Cognition and Affect: A Neuromarketing Study Using Voxel-Based Morphometry
Jianping Huang, Tsinghua University
Yang Sun, Tsinghua University
Jie Sui, University of Bath, UK
Xiaoang Wan, Tsinghua University