F11. Anti-Consumption For Sustainability: the Environmental Impact of Anti-Consumption Lifestyles, Environmentally Concerned Individuals and Ethical Consumers

We compare the environmental impact of anti-consumption lifestyles, ethical consumption and environmental concern. Environmental impact is lowest for tightwadism (i.e. an anti-consumption lifestyle), unrelated with environmental concern, and highest for ethical consumption. Such findings suggest that resisting consumption offers a viable and effective way towards sustainable consumption.



Citation:

Laurie Touchette and Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno (2018) ,"F11. Anti-Consumption For Sustainability: the Environmental Impact of Anti-Consumption Lifestyles, Environmentally Concerned Individuals and Ethical Consumers", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 931-931.

Authors

Laurie Touchette, HEC Montreal, Canada
Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno, HEC Montreal, Canada



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Flavor Fatigue: How Cognitive Depletion Reduces Enjoyment of Complex Flavors

Rhonda Hadi, Oxford University, UK
Dan Rubin, St. John’s University
Diogo Hildebrand, Baruch College, USA
Thomas Kramer, University of California Riverside, USA

Read More

Featured

Brands as Mediators: A Research Agenda

Philipp K. Wegerer, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Read More

Featured

K6. Persuading the Moral Consumer: Matching Messages to Attitude Basis

Aviva Philipp-Muller, Ohio State University, USA
Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.