Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments

We examine the effectiveness of healthy eating nudges in field settings. We perform a multivariate three-level meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes controlling for eating behavior, population, and study characteristics. The effect sizes increase as the focus of the intervention shifts from cognition (Cohen’s d=.09) to affect (d=.24) to behavior (d=.37).



Citation:

Romain Cadario and Pierre Chandon (2018) ,"Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 497-497.

Authors

Romain Cadario, IESEG School of Management
Pierre Chandon, INSEAD, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

B9. The Power of Self-Effacing Brand Messages: Building Trust and Increasing Brand Attitudes

Tessa Garcia-Collart, Florida International University
Jessica Rixom, University of Nevada, Reno

Read More

Featured

E4. Doing Good for Nothing: Motive Inferences from the Probabilistic Profits of Prosociality

Ike Silver, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Jackie Silverman, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

Mistaking the Journey for the Destination: Overestimating the Fruits of (More) Labor

Eva C Buechel, University of Southern California, USA
Carey K. Morewedge, Boston University, USA
Jiao Zhang, University of Oregon, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.