Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments
We examine the effectiveness of healthy eating nudges in field settings. We perform a multivariate three-level meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes controlling for eating behavior, population, and study characteristics. The effect sizes increase as the focus of the intervention shifts from cognition (Cohen’s d=.09) to affect (d=.24) to behavior (d=.37).
Romain Cadario and Pierre Chandon (2018) ,"Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 497-497.
Romain Cadario, IESEG School of Management
Pierre Chandon, INSEAD, France
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
B9. The Power of Self-Effacing Brand Messages: Building Trust and Increasing Brand Attitudes
Tessa Garcia-Collart, Florida International University
Jessica Rixom, University of Nevada, Reno
E4. Doing Good for Nothing: Motive Inferences from the Probabilistic Profits of Prosociality
Ike Silver, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Jackie Silverman, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Mistaking the Journey for the Destination: Overestimating the Fruits of (More) Labor
Eva C Buechel, University of Southern California, USA
Carey K. Morewedge, Boston University, USA
Jiao Zhang, University of Oregon, USA