Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments

We examine the effectiveness of healthy eating nudges in field settings. We perform a multivariate three-level meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes controlling for eating behavior, population, and study characteristics. The effect sizes increase as the focus of the intervention shifts from cognition (Cohen’s d=.09) to affect (d=.24) to behavior (d=.37).



Citation:

Romain Cadario and Pierre Chandon (2018) ,"Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 497-497.

Authors

Romain Cadario, IESEG School of Management
Pierre Chandon, INSEAD, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Better Marketing for a Better World

Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Jonathan Zev Berman, London Business School, UK
Darren Dahl, University of British Columbia, Canada
Markus Giesler, York University, Canada
Rebecca Hamilton, Georgetown University, USA
Gita Venkataramani Johar, Columbia University, USA
John Lynch, University of Colorado, USA
Andrea Morales, Arizona State University, USA

Read More

Featured

Immigration, Abortion, and Gay Marriage – Oh My!

TJ Weber, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Chris Hydock, Georgetown University, USA
Jeff Joireman, Washington State University, USA
David Sprott, Washington State University, USA

Read More

Featured

Changes in Environment Restore Self-Control

Nicole Mead, University of Melbourne, Australia
Jonathan Levav, Stanford University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.