Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments

We examine the effectiveness of healthy eating nudges in field settings. We perform a multivariate three-level meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes controlling for eating behavior, population, and study characteristics. The effect sizes increase as the focus of the intervention shifts from cognition (Cohen’s d=.09) to affect (d=.24) to behavior (d=.37).



Citation:

Romain Cadario and Pierre Chandon (2018) ,"Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 497-497.

Authors

Romain Cadario, IESEG School of Management
Pierre Chandon, INSEAD, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

H10. No Pain, No Out-of-Box Thinking: An Examination of the Effects of Self-Threat on Creativity

Huan You, University of Manitoba, Canada
Fang Wan, University of Manitoba, Canada
Luke Zhu, University of Manitoba, Canada
Haiyang Yang, Johns Hopkins University

Read More

Featured

R4. Human Brands and Their Consumers: How Consumers Reform Brand Understandings Following Critical Incidents

Kimberley Mosher Preiksaitis, Siena College

Read More

Featured

Communicate Healthiness Through Indirect Measures: The Effect of Food in Motion Figure on the Perceived Healthiness of Food

Moty Amar, Ono Academic College (OAC)
Yaniv Gvili, Ono Academic College (OAC)
Aner Tal, Ono Academic College (OAC)

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.