Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments

We examine the effectiveness of healthy eating nudges in field settings. We perform a multivariate three-level meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes controlling for eating behavior, population, and study characteristics. The effect sizes increase as the focus of the intervention shifts from cognition (Cohen’s d=.09) to affect (d=.24) to behavior (d=.37).



Citation:

Romain Cadario and Pierre Chandon (2018) ,"Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 497-497.

Authors

Romain Cadario, IESEG School of Management
Pierre Chandon, INSEAD, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Doing Worse but Feeling Better: Consequences of Collective Choice

Nuno Jose Lopes, University of Navarra
Elena Reutskaja, IESE Business School

Read More

Featured

Morality Matters in the Marketplace: The Influence of Morally Based Attitudes on Consumer Purchase Intentions

Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Jacob Teeny, Ohio State University, USA
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA

Read More

Featured

Personal Budgeting: Does It Work?

Christina Kan, Texas A&M University, USA
Philip M. Fernbach, University of Colorado, USA
John Lynch, University of Colorado, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.