Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments

We examine the effectiveness of healthy eating nudges in field settings. We perform a multivariate three-level meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes controlling for eating behavior, population, and study characteristics. The effect sizes increase as the focus of the intervention shifts from cognition (Cohen’s d=.09) to affect (d=.24) to behavior (d=.37).



Citation:

Romain Cadario and Pierre Chandon (2018) ,"Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? a Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 497-497.

Authors

Romain Cadario, IESEG School of Management
Pierre Chandon, INSEAD, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

G11. Sensory Placebo Effects: The Role of Sensory Signaling in Enhancing Marketing Placebos and Consumer Outcomes

Dan King, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, USA
Sumitra Auschaitrakul, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce

Read More

Featured

N7. Emotion Or Information? Effects Of Online Social Support On Customer Engagement

Chuang Wei, Tsinghua University
Maggie Wenjing Liu, Tsinghua University
Qichao Zhu, Tsinghua University

Read More

Featured

Foods for Sharing: The Social Value of Handmade Foods

Xin Wang, Nanjing University
Chunqu Xiao, Nanjing University
Xingyu Duan, Nanjing University
Hong Zhu, Nanjing University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.