The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers
Online shaming entails two contradictory outcomes: informal enforcement against deviant behavior, and violation of privacy rights. A set of studies demonstrates this duality and emphasizes the role of moral concerns in driving participation in online shaming. The results further highlight the effect of high (vs. low) identifiability of the wrongdoer.
Citation:
Chen Pundak, Yael Steinhart, and Jacob Goldenberg (2018) ,"The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 752-753.
Authors
Chen Pundak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Jacob Goldenberg, IDC
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Paying to Be Social? How Materialism Shapes Spending on Friends
William Ding, Washington State University, USA
David Sprott, Washington State University, USA
Andrew Perkins, Washington State University, USA
Featured
Consuming Commodified Selves – Accelerated Identity Co-Construction Dynamics Through Fashion Performances on Instagram
Jonathan David Schöps, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Featured
The Effect of Fertility on Women’s Word-of-Mouth Behavior
Sevincgul Ulu, Rutgers University, USA
Kristina Durante, Rutgers University, USA
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Aekyoung Kim, Rutgers University, USA