The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers
Online shaming entails two contradictory outcomes: informal enforcement against deviant behavior, and violation of privacy rights. A set of studies demonstrates this duality and emphasizes the role of moral concerns in driving participation in online shaming. The results further highlight the effect of high (vs. low) identifiability of the wrongdoer.
Citation:
Chen Pundak, Yael Steinhart, and Jacob Goldenberg (2018) ,"The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 752-753.
Authors
Chen Pundak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Jacob Goldenberg, IDC
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
D10. It's Meant for Me: When Serendipity Increases Word-of-Mouth
Colleen Patricia Kirk, New York Institute of Technology
Joann Peck, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Claire Hart, University of South Hampton, UK
Constantine Sedikides, University of South Hampton, UK
Featured
G8. How Does Pronunciation Difficulty of Brand Names Influence Consumer Responses? The Role of Self-Construal
Gunben Ceren Aksu, Rutgers University, USA
Yeni Zhou, Rutgers University, USA
Alokparna (Sonia) Monga, Rutgers University, USA
Featured
Can’t Take the Heat? Randomized Field Experiments in Household Electricity Consumption
Praveen Kumar Kopalle, Dartmouth College, USA