The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers
Online shaming entails two contradictory outcomes: informal enforcement against deviant behavior, and violation of privacy rights. A set of studies demonstrates this duality and emphasizes the role of moral concerns in driving participation in online shaming. The results further highlight the effect of high (vs. low) identifiability of the wrongdoer.
Citation:
Chen Pundak, Yael Steinhart, and Jacob Goldenberg (2018) ,"The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 752-753.
Authors
Chen Pundak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Jacob Goldenberg, IDC
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Exposing the Lie Beneath Hypertext Marketing: Implications for Trademark Violation
Laura R Oswald, Marketing Semiotics
Featured
H12. Does Economic Development Influence Consumer Innovativeness?
Fuchun Zhan, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Nancy Wong, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Julie Anne Lee, University of Western Australia
Featured
E5. Volunteer Motivations for Direct versus Indirect Service
Abigail Schneider, Regis University
Eric Hamerman, Iona College