The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers
Online shaming entails two contradictory outcomes: informal enforcement against deviant behavior, and violation of privacy rights. A set of studies demonstrates this duality and emphasizes the role of moral concerns in driving participation in online shaming. The results further highlight the effect of high (vs. low) identifiability of the wrongdoer.
Citation:
Chen Pundak, Yael Steinhart, and Jacob Goldenberg (2018) ,"The Viciousness and Caring of Sharing: Conflicts and Motivations of Online Shamers", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46, eds. Andrew Gershoff, Robert Kozinets, and Tiffany White, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 752-753.
Authors
Chen Pundak, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Yael Steinhart, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Jacob Goldenberg, IDC
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 46 | 2018
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
With or Without You: When Second Person Pronouns Engage Listeners
Grant M Packard, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Featured
How Incremental Theory Enhances or Reduces Charitable Giving
Alyssa Yoon, Korea University, Korea
Jongwon Park, Korea University, Korea
Featured
N4. Induction of Construal-Level Mindset via Surprise and the Follow-up Effect on Consumer Evaluations and Judgments
Atul A Kulkarni, University of Missouri, USA
Joëlle Vanhamme, EDHEC Business School, France